In the books, his body was found, surrounded by 5 knights that he had beaten to death with the wooden practice sword before being killed.

From what I read, it's during the original war that tied the 7 kingdoms together, when the Targaryens invaded with dragons.

That was rough, Kotaku. I can't imagine if either of my sons got cancer. And, after looking at the youtube videos and all of the people writing RIP, though he's not dead yet tore my heart out. Those are some great people that did this for Ribbitribbit.

Grandia 2. It actually had a story that could be followed. Or, Suikoden, just for the dice game.

It's not the Publisher's fault if the only things that we buy en masse are simplistic FPS, and Sims games. And, when they do take a chance (Psychonauts, Mirror's Edge) we shrug and don't buy.

Those 4 people were kids with no money that had a better childhood because Wasteland existed. You can't put a price on what makes your life better. :)

Or, more simply, people spread the word.

I wonder how Robertson felt after Dear Esther came out? Did she feel the failure to create a game that could convey emotion, without the normal tropes that are attached to gaming, more acutely?

And, what's with the Sodomy preset always being set to "inverted"?

A firm handshake is the difference between a manager and an hourly employee. Who knows how much higher you'd be in your career if you'd had a stronger handshake?

Hey there. Just popping in to say, maybe you should spend more time hanging out by a lake, or taking care of a Zen garden. You're not going to get KoToR 3, ever. So, calm down and enjoy your life. :)

You broke my heart, Turtle soup, you broke my heart. ;)

And, this has been a word from Fredo.

Nice troll. Whether or not something is "good" or "bad" is completely subjective. Taste is relative. I love the Mass Effect series. You don't like it. But, our viewpoints are only facts to us, not to everyone else. But, nice troll.

He went crazy with a turkey baster a few years back. :)

New research shows that researchers are invariably attracted to researching douchey people, and then coming up with a reason that they researched them afterwards.

Or, maybe, you should respect the person's view of the situation instead of demeaning her more by treating her own opinion on what happened (to her, not you) as invalid.

It dropped to halfway down the third page for me.

It's not a "False Definition" as long as it's "widely accepted" by that definition. I accept Santorum defined as a "frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter". And, quite a few people are aware of that definition. Therefore, it's a real definition.

Yes, it is. Otherwise it's psychological warfare. Unless it's against the rules of the tournament, then it falls under the "Play to Win" credo.