Yes, but looks like the college went with the simplest option (ignoring other concerns.) Adding an “everyone welcome” sign is easier than figuring out where to put the men.

It frustrates me that the MRA movement could actually do some good for men (paternity leave, resources for male rape victims, etc.) Instead there’s a ton of guys in the comments who talk about equality but are bragging about a decision that hurts women and doesn’t meaningfully benefit men.

Yes. Notice that I specified “creeps” instead of saying “men.”

I don’t know what it is, feel like I’ve been seeing them everywhere lately.

Ughhh that’s what I thought at first, but when I went back to check I stopped at the first sentence.

I would be happier with this outcome if it looked like male students actually felt excluded. Looks like it’s just a male professor with an agenda.

I’ve seen drastic differences in how people are affected by a single drink, too. Age, weight, gender etc. can make so much of a difference.

What if it’s 90.0000% and 90.0001%? I never said it was unjustified, but for all we know they zoomed in on a straight line.

Too bad, I was planning to buy it.

I’m glad they said something about it, but that graph is useless without any kind of scale.

A lot of them honestly believe that they aren’t racist. They think entire groups of people are just making it up for sympathy points or something. Meanwhile, they’re the ones throwing a fit and going deep into denial over a future where they’re slowly losing some of their privilege.

Exactly. I know a bunch of people who feel comfortable using racial slurs etc., but they “aren’t racist” just because they’re not in the Klan or similar.

I used to feel pretty sad that people still support him after each awful thing he does, but at least he’s slowly chipping away his base. The more he talks, the more chances he has to anger random groups while Hillary stays professional.

I remember the days years decade when people said the same thing about Duke Nukem. I’m hoping it’ll happen, but I’m not optimistic about when or how close it’ll stay to the original idea.

I honestly don’t care what anyone says, if you take off your clothes willingly and have sex with a person, as far as they are concerned, by your own actions, it is consensual. That’s all that matters.

I’ll probably memorize all their locations sooner or later, but several of them are close enough that it’s just as easy to walk around with my phone than take it in and out of my pocket to swipe/capture. It’s a college campus and usually there’s a bunch of lures.

I look at the screen to navigate towards pokestops. There’s a dense cluster around my work.

What if you’re so drunk you need help getting out of your clothes, and you won’t remember anything? Does it matter if your partner got you that level of drunk purposely because they knew you wouldn’t agree otherwise? What if you’re underage and never explicitly tell your older partner? What if you agree to sex only…

I don’t think you realize that sexual coercion is also a very bad thing and the line between it and rape can be pretty hard to find.

This is a really dangerous road to go down. Misrepresenting things like this only undermines feminist credibility, and there’s plenty of outrage to go around without the need for exaggeration or casting out people who don’t agree with it. The self-righteous mob mentality isn’t doing any favors for the underlying…