No, that’s how a teacher keeps his job. It makes sense to be fair, that’s not some fight against racism. Most people, go figure, aren’t inherently racist or sexist.

These people are tripping over themselves trying to prove how not sexist they are. Swapping out, writing articles, grilling showrunners and other judges. Pat right here is like, “Even I’m a little sexist sometimes” (paraphrasing). Are these the people you think have some kind of inherent misogyny issue? That is the…

You know people who went nuts over Tetris Attack?! Can you introduce me?

Diversity within the panel leads to diversity of opinion, though. There’s a ton of inherent bias that comes with how you’re raised, etc. A woman might review a title like, for example, Long Live the Queen differently than a man would. A black man might have a different perspective on the writing in Watch Dogs. If a…

I’m not saying they’re biological equal. I’m saying those inequalities do.not.matter. to the things you’re claiming. You have no scientific evidence for claiming that, all cultural reasons aside, women would like science or games less.

Why is it regressive? It says the judges are qualified to choose an equally qualified replacement, I would think.

Why would you think there will always be fewer women? Why do you think there’s a biological difference?

No, it does.

One out of several.

Then neither are the guys playing Clash of Clans because of Kate Upton’s boobs. You got stats for them?

Because preventing 6/94 is the same as forcing 50/50.

So... there’s some magical, unknown reason why women and men want different things, but it has absolutely nothing to do with sexism or discrimination of any kind.

I thought Fassbender was cleared of any wrongdoing? That wouldn’t necessarily mean he was innocent, but he shouldn’t be in the same category as admitted abusers.

Uggggggh. Has anyone actually been complaining about the depiction of women in these games, specifically? People mostly don’t criticize porn, and I can’t imagine everybody plays this for the gameplay.

Most arguments I’ve seen boil down to 1. The criminal deserves it and 2. the family of the victims deserves justice. But a lot of people believe in it because it’s always been done, and the attitude is likely to shift away as time goes on.

“Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.”

Yep! The added court costs are super expensive, and most people live on death row for decades anyway.

I hope he doesn’t get the death penalty. If we could take all that money and spend it on something, like, say, Planned Parenthood... *sigh*

Man in the Castle has one woman. Walking Dead spent the first two seasons without any women characters who weren’t bogus. You are using these as examples of non-pushy feminist shows, but JJ is somehow on another level in terms of agency inequality. I just don’t understand the hypocrisy here.

You complained about the lack of men on the show and their (supposed) lack of agency. Either you’re backtracking, or you’re being unclear, because there’s a lot of commenters here who aren’t “getting it.”