I voted 'crack pipe' and I do have plenty of an idea of what this car is and what the classic car market is like.
I voted 'crack pipe' and I do have plenty of an idea of what this car is and what the classic car market is like.
I think you're arguing with me, yet we seem to be in agreement. That said, I love this as much as the outgoing C63. I disagree with the nomenclature, but I see why they did this. The reputation of the previous C63 is a powerful marketing tool. A C40 would sound cheap by comparison.
I understand the need to for a constant stream of content, but this is straight-up silly. The Raptor has been ridiculous and obnoxious since day 1. The bold grill of the original Raptor was over the top and obnoxious. The tailgate is fitting with the personality with the truck. It looks well-placed and appropriate.…
Insert that "Take my money" image here.
Depreciation always matters.
With Supra headlights.
I wouldn't wear a victory over a 4th gen, V6 Camaro as a badge of honor. That said, that seemed to be a hot little hatch with performance reminiscent of a first-gen VW GTI.
This same rule applies to baby names in that people tend to become the opposite of their given name. Chastity will be a friend with benefits. Hope will be a pit of despair. Grace may walk like Goofy.
Torch! Front-engine Chevy LS conversion. You're not looking deep enough.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Why did I just assume that this was located somewhere in Florida? Does that make me too judgmental?
Hmmm. Still not an M3. Chassis-mate doesn't qualify as an M3. Also adding M3 badges and go-fast goodies doesn't make an M3. That said, I'm a Mercedes-Benz guy.
Not an M3.
I'm the last person you'll have to challenge on the topic of work ethic. That said, being a good worker means more than just showing up everyday. You mentioned in your own post that you have paid sick time. If you're a public health risk, stay at home and be kind to your fellow citizen.
If your point is valid and substantial you should continue to support it. I am not arguing that racism is real and a very bad thing. What I'm saying is that irrational behavior in this case doesn't equal racism. Perhaps as bad as racism is the quickness of many to label things as racism.
What I get from your response is that you're unable to articulate a meaningful follow-up to your argument. If this were a debate, you would not be the victor.
I did, from top to bottom.
Did you read the same article? Are you referring to a different one? I'm not denying that there was an overreaction, but the woman asked for assistance because she was sick. Flight attendants are not nurses or doctors but they are hired to make flights less crappy and to do their best to protect the safety of others.
Just because you call something racism, doesn't make it so. Racism exists and it is a real problem, but it is also irresponsible to pull the race card indiscriminately.
Umm, hmm, I don't doubt the sad reality of racism exists, but you can't always pull the race card here. Also, according to Torch's post, the person you mention didn't appear to be exhibiting any signs of illness and thus not subject to similar scrutiny. You can call something racism, but that doesn't make it so.