And yet the article you posted to support that claim was that there was a pro trump watch party in Russia. You really blew the lid off of that one. It definitely made it “hilarious.”

No, I’m still pissed that they meddled in the election. That said, neither of the articles you’ve posted hint at any evidence of collusion.

England was a hypothetical. Nothing in the article you posted suggested anything other than some people in Russia wanted trump to win. Fuck, a bar around the corner from me in Chicago is a huge European soccer bar that is packed for big games. I guess that means they are involved in match fixing.

I think the point was that when most people hear “naked congressperson” they picture a paunchy white guy in his early 60's with oddly splotchy skin. It’s not a pleasant image.

*cough* Hulk Hogan *cough*

Gross. What sort of sicko would publicize compromising images of someone without their permission? What is this former aide trying to do? Get bought out by Univision?

Frisker?

While I certainly think the Trunp campaign colluded with Russian authorities, I’m quite not sure what to make of the article you posted. I mean, how is the party described in that article different from one in England that would have supported Hillary?

Disheartened because the Cubs got Quintana, or because the Sox dealt him?

I’m sure you guys will be thrilled to know that a couple of the guys from barstool actually specified that Jimenez and Cease would be going to the White Sox for Quintana 2 hours before that post was made. . .

Uh... Coolest logo in sports? It’s solid, but it’s not even the coolest Midwestern NHL team logo.

2 minutes is 2 minutes. And “hardly an impediment” is still an impediment.

Declaring his Twitter account to be an official outlet and then selectively limiting certain individuals’ access to that poses problems. I’m not saying it’s necessarily illegal, but, respective to the general public, it does reduce those individuals’ access based solely on the fact that they do not like what those…

That’s a false equivalent in that digital releases are not limited by physical space and legitimate security concerns. This is an “ADDED impediment” that does not need to exist.

Fair enough.

It is still an added impediment that isn’t equally applied across the board. It also prevents (until they login to a second account) those people from responding in a manner that is open to everyone else.

It is still an added impediment that isn’t equally applied across the board. It also prevents (until they login to a second account) those people from responding in a manner that is open to everyone else.

The crux of the matter is that the White House has declared the tweets made from that to be “official statements.” Preventing someone from accessing official government statements is, at the very least, considerably problematic.

She accelerated through a red light and stopped in the intersection. Yes, the other driver should have been able to avoid her car, but that that doesn’t mean Venus wasn’t at fault there.

“Racist.”