Precisely. This is a much more easily proved claim. They just have to show that one team asked about him about kneeling and that should be enough to show they violated the CBA.

How do you deem it collusion based on the fact that one team didn’t make an offer? It certainly looks like the Bengals violated the CBA by asking if he plans to continue drawing attention to social issues, but that doesn’t validate Reid’s initial claim. For that to be the case, he has to show multiple teams discussed…

My claim to a “better legal understanding” is that I’ve seen a decent amount of Law and Order episodes. So I’m on pretty solid footing over here.

It is because he’s not good enough.

Do you sense even a bit of irony in making this comment on a story posted to Deadspin?

Eh hem... they actually acted appropriately.

Yeah, probably. I don’t quite have the energy to really hate her, but I made a dismissive face as I read the article.

I can’t imagine he will sue, as he posted a blog slamming this article more strongly than the inital video.

Somehow, one of the more absurd phrases in this article is “he told Michael Strahan.”

I thought the title said Chris Christie and now I’m sad.

Until it suits the writer’s purpose...

Gawker defies a court order to take down a secretly recorded video of a man having sex and they’re the victim of a different man that they outed as gay.

Miller is definitely one of those exceptionally well-liked, “what could’ve been” guys. Also, that was a fucking touchdown.

I wish I could give you two stars, you clever son of a bitch.

I don’t care about the hand shaking. But after that cheap shot he took, Mayfield has reason to *ahem* rub it in Kansas’ face.

So many Bulls players.... Christ they’re bad...

No, it’s actually quite the opposite. She was not asked to “sign away her right to be offended,” but rather to acknowledge there would be open talk about potentially offensive material that they cover within their office and that there was reason to suspect she COULD be offended. They also offered to rewrite the…

They’re asking new employees to acknowledge that that material is part of what others in the office cover and, naturally, they will be openly discussing the things they are covering. This is not referring to inappropriate acts directed AT unwilling employees.

But how does their steel drum driven celebration compare?

Those were both very nice throws, but I was told there was an impossible one in the mix... neither is in the same stratosphere his Hail Marys.