Certainly more evidence that his revolution will change everything.
Certainly more evidence that his revolution will change everything.
In New York you can register to vote any time in the year you turn 18 by December 31:
Cool.
That’s a good barometer for how great honey is: there really was no description of its production you could have offered that would make me stopping eating it.
Kelly better get the epinephrine handy cause she’s about to get STUNG by a Bee...
And yet the Catholic Church still exists, the Denny Hastert didn’t lead to the dissolution of the Republican Party, and the endless list of outed perverts and hucksters in the Evangelical movement has barely slowed them down.
+1 Jalepeno popper
I can think of no better way to ensure that every substantial policy point Bernie fights for is burned to the ground.
Don’t disagree, but it just stings less coming from Trump. It’s a legitimate point coming from a progressive dude like Sanders, the rich real estate scammer/casino owner/reality star? Eh, I’m not super worried about that.
I’m mostly hoping that what happened in Nevada isn’t a harbinger of things to come. Sanders, himself, is still pushing the narrative that he can win combined with the notion that dirty tricks have kept him from the nomination. That’s a dangerous mix, as we saw in Nevada.
For the most part, yes, but there are things like the Wall Street speeches and related things that he’s gone after Clinton for. Regardless of how you feel about the legitimacy of that issue, it failed. He lost the race. There’s no point in bringing things like that up now.
It changes to tone and tactics.
I agree with you, but I’m a little more optimistic. The people who control the DNC are in charge because they were elected. They’re Congresspeople and governors. Start electing different congresspeople and Governors, the DNC will change.
Guess that’s more stylish than wearing a dunce cap. Same effect.
There’s no game of chicken, it’s just you driving off a cliff.
Then do whatever the fuck you want. I disagree with it, as well, but I don’t think any problem with Hillary is solved by seating a Republican.
Most of Hillarys super-delegates were pledged to her before the race even started.
That’s a fatalist attitude I disagree with. Completely on board with your first paragraph, but I think you dramatically underestimate the speed with which things can change. It takes work and a focus on the less sexy elections, but Sanders has proven there are a ton of people out there who want progressive change, and…
I’m not taking any risks with Trump. I think Hillary will win regardless of how the rest of this goes, but why raise the degree of difficulty?
I can see value in staying so all 50 states can vote then rolling into the convention to make the argument that he represents a sizable portion of the Democratic electorate and his ideas should make it into the platform.