Huh. Thanks for the token contrarianism. Apparently you don't know a lot about the 1960s-1970s NBA. But hey, thanks for stopping by.

Really? Let's see, the Knicks play in the #1 media market, they're one of the only two teams that reside in their original city, the '70 and '73 championship teams are generally acknowledged as legendary, the Bulls/Pacers/Knicks rivalry was amazing in the 1990s, they play in the mecca of basketball MSG, and also:…

I can't wait to see how badly we screw up what will most likely be a very high first round pick: trade it away for something awful OR draft an awful player?

I get that they are geographic rivals, but come on, t they only play each other every four freaking years. If you're counting head-to-head, the 49ers won the previous three games before this loss, and if you're counting record and playoff appearances in the last decade the Niners completely crush the Raiders. So, good…

Yea and the Raiders have really shown they know how to make those high draft picks pay off.

Is it just me or is everything about this fucking annoying?

Heck, I'm a raging Sox fan and I can't make a decent case for him getting in.

I know I know I know, I get it now, I erroneously assumed there's no way the D would be so turned around as to not field 11 players and I assumed it was the offense.

Ugh, crap, so much for my ability to pay attention and think before posting. Now the question I have is how the hell does A&M let that happen? That's crazy.

100% agree, I didn't notice him lining up there at first either, I think if you did see him it would make it even more confusing whom to cover and how.

I see eleven, did you maybe miss the WR lined up on the top of the screen?