It’s kind of like not eating a cookie. If you don’t eat the cookie, you deny the cookie its entire reason for being.

They have literally been doing their best to ruin the user experience as much as possible. Everything is designed to maximize clicks/views while ignoring that users who don’t like the changes will simply stop returning at some point. 

“that is, of course, what recalls are for”

Between the rusty sledgehammer crushing the oreos, rusty shovel scooping the sugar, and using an old oily doorknob as the agitator, no way in hell I’m eating what he made.

I’ll leave this here on the latest CPI release. The number one inflation related item? Vehicle repair. The second? Auto Insurance rates. CA has denied rate hikes post-COVID despite the early trends in inflation related to automobile replacement costs and repairs. Sure, there have been rate increases now approved but…

This isn’t unexpected... Insurance companies are FOR PROFIT... When California doesn’t allow them to raise home insurance costs to cover the expensive wildfire damages in the last decade, they’re gonna try to raise other costs to cover that shit.

I prefer all my gears be in the same gearbox. Thanks. 

Congrats on bringing the morning shift back to a single post. Much better! 

Thank you for restoring Morning Shift.

There are NO details in the “Article” about what emissions would be regulated, nor what those limits were proposed. If your mission was to inflame along political lines you weakly scored with this “Article.”  If your mission was to inform people then you failed on every count.

Building EV’s in a quantity that is enough to largely replace all ICE’s isn’t possible right now. Using batteries to make Hybrids and PHEV’s now and working on battery tech is a better idea. We can produce more Hybrid/PHEV’s to replace more ICE’s more quickly and reduce emission faster than going full EV.

I sort of “get” why Toyota has been slow on introducing EVs. Their entire brand identity is in making not-so-exciting vehicles that will last 20+ years and run for 250-300,000+ miles without a problem. They keep the same engines and drivetrains for decades on end because once the design is perfected there’s no…

Those who are old enough to know realize that these were some of the shittiest cars ever. Just because something is old doesn’t make it good. NDx10

As a long-time Fiat 500 owner who loves his car, some thoughts for FIAT on the 500e coming back, and its inevitable future failure in the states:

Scout wasn’t actually a brand. International Harvester was the brand, Scout and Scout II were models. While only olds like me remember it as a model (and not very fondly), the name by itself is excellent for something at least pretending to be a rugged off-roader. 

Because they keep spending money on useless things. When you have 105 billion dollars to work with, maybe take care of actual needs first like infrastructure and updating schools, than trying to build a fast train. Maybe instead of telling the common man how to spend money and to save for a rainy day, the state should…

1st. So what you are saying is that we are about to get a flood of rust free used cars in the rest of the US, and that the poor in California are about to get shafted into expensive EVs that they may not be able to easily charge. Or bloated prices on used gas cars already in the state. Or be forced onto the pitiful…

1st gear: that’s still a long way away (which is needed). The state could offer tax incentives to companies that have a 80% work from home rate and employees that work from home. For people that have to come in to the office, if the first part works well, traffic could be cut in half at least, which is savings right…

“Do you think Toyota’s being pragmatic, or coming up with excuses? Maybe a little of both? It’s always a little of both, isn’t it?”

Anyone who has actually looked at the data will come to the same conclusions as Toyota.