I don’t want to relive how bad these cars really were, and I don’t want my grandchildren knowing either.

The EPA, nor the presidency, should not be making laws. The correct order would be: 1) EPA explains what the new law should be and why, 2) Congress passes the law, 3) the president signs the law. The people, by electing their leaders, have had their say.

A 24-year-old Subaru, maybe. This car, not so much.

Looks like other companies are adopting the Toyota Way by finally embracing hybrids.

Obviously, you have never been to a church potluck where beans and cabbage was served.

They want us to adopt EV’s, but they won’t allow affordable ones to be imported to protect against job losses? The American auto makers are plenty smart enough to still make money, this is why they don’t make small affordable cars.

My first generation Miata is still a joy to drive, but ingress/egress is getting more difficult as I get older.

I don’t know, my old man mind thinks it’s kinda cool; but it is a Chrysler product. No Dice

With the mass adoption of EV’s I think it’s high time those owners start paying their fair share of road maintenance taxes. Some people rich enough to afford new EV’s got $7,500 tax credits, and they don’t have to pay road taxes. There’s something wrong with that picture.

Well, if I truly believed EV’s would help save the planet and all I could afford was a Chinese made EV, then yes, I’d buy one.

Now we truly have to make a choice; do we want to allow affordable electric vehicles to propel us to a sustainable future, or do we want to exclude a whole class of people unable to afford an electric vehicle?

If we’re serious about promoting electric vehicles we should not be adding tariffs to Chinese vehicles. What is the average Joe supposed to be able to afford?

POS then, POS now. No dice at any price.

I have no idea what these are worth, but I doubt ANY Fiat could be worth that much. ND

Ford’s quality issues are nothing new. In 1984 my wife and I bought our first new car ever; it was a Ford Tempo. Ads at the time said, “the quality goes in before the name goes on” and showed a factory worker happily slapping on a Ford emblem. That car was a POS that needed 3 transmissions in the first 36,000 miles,…

Count me as old, but I just don’t see those little delivery robots as becoming a successful business. They are too easy to flip over just for fun. I don’t know how difficult it is to break into to steal the contents either. Like electric scooter rentals, a good idea on paper but not in practice.

Once again Toyota has it right. A company has to make cars that people want NOW, and at a profit. They’ll be there as the EV revolution unfolds. Some of the EV and ICE makers will go out of business as they run out of money.

More Lincoln dealers gone. Ford should just go ahead and close the whole thing already. No compelling products equals no compelling sales.

If adopted this will cause more highway deaths than it will save. I recently passed a big truck on a two-lane highway going 45 in a 55 zone; I really had to step on it with my little car to pass quickly. I ended up going 70 for a brief period to make the pass as quickly as possible. Can you imagine what the head-on…

A true marvel of engineering