marcyjcook
ItWorks!
marcyjcook

That is an amazing car. Just beautiful!

I fundamentally disagree, but that hardly matters does it.

They are minors, very little the police can do. The parents that didn't say anything though, that's messed up.

Forget it, it's lost in the number of people just being abusive now. It doesn't matter.

It wasn't offence, it was a request to phrase things in a more considerate manner when talking about sensitive topics. That was all. It's just kinda got blown up.

Thanks. It's not like I don't feel attacked enough. Feel free to keep going.

It was the phrasing that bothered me which is why I asked them to phrase things in a more considerate manner next time. No dice though. I've had enough of this, I'm moving on before the abusive assholes arrive in force and rip me apart for even daring to ask someone to be considerate. How fucking could I. They are

Have you noticed that in every reply that you have made all you have done is dismiss what I said? Did you think even once think to yourself 'Oh, OK, yes I can try harder to phrase things more clearly when discussing a sensitive topic.' Anyway, impasse reached, let's call it a day.

You missed the point utterly. I asked for more considerate phrasing. That was all.

Mostly the dismissal, that phrasing when it comes to transgender issues doesn't matter. Then the inability to listen to someone who is transgender talk on a transgender topic. Cis people override even transgender topics. Basically I'm frustrated because I've been through this about 1000000000000 times before but

Come on. Way to miss the point.

Your assumption that I don't understand is a little beyond rude.

You are not listening, all you are doing is defending for no reason when I questioned your phrasing. This is not a legal situation or a court. Outside of those you can phrase things in a more considerate manner, no?

OK, then say 'legal class'. Otherwise to non legalese people the phrasing looks bad.

Us transgender people are not a class. We're normal humans.

I don't think that was the point they were making.

Don't assume all transgender people want surgery. Around 75% do not opt for surgery.

It's a deliberate attempt to dehumanise the woman they fired. They also offer to her as 'him' and 'he' through their documents.

Yet Attorney General Eric Holder has already confirmed that the Justice Department would be interpreting sex discrimination protocol Title VII to include those with transgender status. Saks will lose in a big way.

Thanks. Really shouldnt be grey! :)