manticore416
Manticore416
manticore416

My body’s definitely ready.

Virtual reality advertisements will be crazy. Imagine if you go to watch a streaming VR movie and have to sit through some 60 second virtual world that’s selling you things. Imagine the zaniest commercials and imagine what you’ll get in VR.

The fact that everyone who has responded to you has been criticizing your perspective (or at least how you’re claiming absolute certainty) rather than supporting it. Nobody’s mentioned a thing about you having a good point that they hadn’t seen before.

I highly doubt any children will change their perspectives based on your rants here.

I'm a pastor who preaches every week. But I only preach where people want me to preach. He's not doing it right.

Then their parents are already failing them by not engaging themselves in the lives of their kids.

How is it annoying?

It’s okay to have morals. It’s okay to share them. But people who think they have all the answers and everyone else is wrong are dangerous, and that’s what you’re doing.

I don’t think most people are upset with the approach or tone of the movie, but the execution and final product. After the MoS battle from Bruce’s perspective, I was sold and ready to love what came after it. What should have been a movie about a battle of ideas and the human struggles of each hero accented by fun and

Way to ignore the fact that they removed a pose that didn’t fit with the character it was paired with. They’re not removing the sexiness from characters whose sexiness and sexuality is a clear defining characteristic, they’re just removing a sexy pose from a character who probably wouldn’t be striking sexy poses. Just

No, it means you’re willing to go with the best idea even if it’s not the one you originally had. It means putting aside ego and wanting to make a better product. As the article has said, they’re not taking away sexiness from all female characters. They’re simply removing things that don’t really fit with the

You want us to turn off our brains, but for what benefit? BVS offers me nothing if it can't be at least remotely smart. There's a reason every Marvel Studios film is fresh and this is barely halfway there.

its not super clear that's what was said.

No, it’s not. Dancers aren’t the issue. Dancers there that are geared toward arousing heterosexual males at an event unrelated to that end is the problem. Keep the dancers but give them outfits that reflect the fun of the event rather than give dudes boners. If this was an adult-game party and there were provocative

I'm perfectly calm, thanks, but good attempt at shifting the focus of the discussion.

Yes, people treat this like it’s already the only and most popular way to distribute games, which it isn’t. And sure, developers could sell their games through UWP for things like cross-buy and cross-play, but they could also continue distributing their games through Steam. It’s not as if Microsoft is making

Nothing stopping them? Except for how horrible it would impact business when tons of developers stop developing for them and find a way around it? It would be a PR nightmare, and I guarantee you tons of 3rd party developers would end up boycotting Microsoft altogether, both PC and Xbox. Realistically, it’s a bad

Except there’s no evidence Microsoft plans on limiting access to those tools to people who release their games through UWM, so the whole thing is based on paranoid speculation.

Can someone explain how this is a “monopoly” of any kind? How does this prevent people from releasing on Steam instead? Or some other PC service. It’s pretty ironic when Epic has one themselves that’s required for their own games. Someone was looking for a fight and Epic looks worse because of it.

I have a feeling if the style was less cartoony that people would’ve been more receptive.