Then their parents are already failing them by not engaging themselves in the lives of their kids.

How is it annoying?

It’s okay to have morals. It’s okay to share them. But people who think they have all the answers and everyone else is wrong are dangerous, and that’s what you’re doing.

I don’t think most people are upset with the approach or tone of the movie, but the execution and final product. After the MoS battle from Bruce’s perspective, I was sold and ready to love what came after it. What should have been a movie about a battle of ideas and the human struggles of each hero accented by fun and…

Way to ignore the fact that they removed a pose that didn’t fit with the character it was paired with. They’re not removing the sexiness from characters whose sexiness and sexuality is a clear defining characteristic, they’re just removing a sexy pose from a character who probably wouldn’t be striking sexy poses. Just…

No, it means you’re willing to go with the best idea even if it’s not the one you originally had. It means putting aside ego and wanting to make a better product. As the article has said, they’re not taking away sexiness from all female characters. They’re simply removing things that don’t really fit with the…

You want us to turn off our brains, but for what benefit? BVS offers me nothing if it can't be at least remotely smart. There's a reason every Marvel Studios film is fresh and this is barely halfway there.

its not super clear that's what was said.

No, it’s not. Dancers aren’t the issue. Dancers there that are geared toward arousing heterosexual males at an event unrelated to that end is the problem. Keep the dancers but give them outfits that reflect the fun of the event rather than give dudes boners. If this was an adult-game party and there were provocative…

I'm perfectly calm, thanks, but good attempt at shifting the focus of the discussion.

Yes, people treat this like it’s already the only and most popular way to distribute games, which it isn’t. And sure, developers could sell their games through UWP for things like cross-buy and cross-play, but they could also continue distributing their games through Steam. It’s not as if Microsoft is making…

Nothing stopping them? Except for how horrible it would impact business when tons of developers stop developing for them and find a way around it? It would be a PR nightmare, and I guarantee you tons of 3rd party developers would end up boycotting Microsoft altogether, both PC and Xbox. Realistically, it’s a bad…

Except there’s no evidence Microsoft plans on limiting access to those tools to people who release their games through UWM, so the whole thing is based on paranoid speculation.

Can someone explain how this is a “monopoly” of any kind? How does this prevent people from releasing on Steam instead? Or some other PC service. It’s pretty ironic when Epic has one themselves that’s required for their own games. Someone was looking for a fight and Epic looks worse because of it.

I have a feeling if the style was less cartoony that people would’ve been more receptive.

Absolutely. I also think it comes from a place of defensiveness. The term makes some white people feel like they’re under attack, when the problem isn’t really the privilege white people have but rather the lack of privilege non-white people have. It sounds like splitting hairs, but it’s a lot easier for some people…

It seems more logical that the “rainbow” would be referring to the colors of the games and not the color of legendaries.

Pokemon has never rushed out for the new system and has always gone where the audience is. It's why Pokemon Yellow only had real color on the title screen, or why Black 2/White 2 was a DS game, rather than a 3DS game.

I’m just impressed they stayed on the burger.

Not sure why you think Rainbow is a logical third title to X and Y. To me, Rainbow sounds like something that would include all regions.