A friend of mine has a 99 score and just got it over the weekend. Even with 10.3.1 he has to take over constantly around where he lives. I think they should still be in invite-only alpha testing.

At no point in the article does it have numbers. Zero details for miles/KWh, or actual rates. It mentions ranges of costs, but not any used for the math.

The cost to add that kind of power is not that expensive, and who would want to pay 6 figures for just 400 electric horsepower even though that is more than plenty for 5000lbs. It lets them try to one-up their gas competition too and appear more valuable. 

I like how the math shows how much the gas costs, $2.81, and the fuel economy, 33mpg, but failed to point out the miles/kwh or $ per kwh for the EV. Which I can do for them. its about 4 miles per KWh on highway driving with a decently efficient EV, which means $12.95 for 100 miles is 25KWhs and that would come to…

Thats my understanding of the issue. She makes money from a company that sells products that helps AI driving. All it takes is a few policy changes about how lidar is required and her wealth would skyrocket. 

went to watkins glen, saw the corning museum, win/win.

So much power and weight and the instant acceleration all just add up to stuff that seemed small is now exponentially worse.

FE qualifying is way more exciting than F1

Jokes on you, these people love any excuse to drive a Tesla. Just like those that drove super slow to get longer range and set some kind of distance on a single charge record. 

Because of the variation in race types I had a few favorites in FH4 which helps offset the fact you just buy something to destroy everything. I remember in Gran Turismo saving up a few $ for a Corvette and then taking on many races with it, until you get to the one-makes or drivetrain/country specific stuff.

3nd Gear: I dont know how important that adapter is in the US. Whats its fastest charging speed going to be? The one that comes free with a Tesla goes up to 50KWs which isnt horrible. Would it really be worth $250 to get a faster speed thats usable at only a few locations, and even then does that location actually…

I remember that, way back in like GT4 days from like 6 console generations ago. Wheres my GT7!!!

You have to send that energy somewhere, which is the hard part.

The Plaid is the first car ever that can accelerate better than it can brake (per Engineering Explained). That is not a compliment, but proof that maybe the brakes need an upgrade.

Last I heard the new cars were easier to drive at the limits because its way more predictable of a setup, and people are expected to be able to push them better. This seems like they are complaining not about controlling the car but simply the ride quality because the tires are not absorbing the road as much. 

Without the credits a company that would meet the goal no longer has the incentive to exceed it.

I guess when your paint matches the plastic its a little harder to notice the plastic.

They already have rules like no DRS when its wet, so we’ve already seen them understand that in bad weather the cars need to be modified in some way. Just take it a step further and add restrictor plates and more downforce than normal, slowing the cars down and helping with hydroplaning. 

I see his basic argument. We the fans want to see competitive racing, and we want to see variation in the cars that show up. It would be cool if RWD and AWD and hybrids all raced together and it actually worked out. In video games they have the BoP type calculations in Forza and Gran Turismo. And both have flaws where…

Its gotta be a point of sale kind of thing. The goal is to defer buyers of new vehicles away from big gas guzzlers and into smaller more efficient thing. People only look at the price on the windshield. If a SUV is only $5k more than the sedan with similar features, they think thats the total cost. But really it needs…