And heretics often think they are geniuses, though they are sub-butt. This take is sub-butt.

You can fuck right off with this heretical shit.

You had god damned better quickly move along. Never have I seen something so egregiously wrong than using chocolate fucking chips. Your marshmallow-roasting license is THIS close to being revoked.

Because you would have to regrade the track on either side of the bridge for about a mile or more and then widen the embankment as you raise the grade, which may or may not be impossible considering how the town may be in the way. It would be a massive undertaking, and the railroad has no obligation to fix it…

No. I see this on every article about this bridge. There is a 0% chance that anyone other than the driver is held liable for any damages. It wouldn’t even reach a jury. Whether a duty is owed is a question of law and a duty is clearly not owed.

That and no one has any duty or obligation to the stupid public that can’t or refuse to read road signs.

Because Dez Bryant’s catch wasn’t ruled a catch. NFL has to be consistently awful. They can’t just admit a rule is bullshit. Doubling down is a favorite past time for them.

Nice.

Your move, Buffalo.

You act like Jones Cormier 2 was even close to the first time he’d been tested before a match or during training. No, he could not have been doping his entire career. It’s disingenuous to even suggest that. He’s a far superior fighter.

The most frustrating thing about this is that Jones didn’t need to dope to beat Cormier. It was completely unnecessary.

But the same complaint can be said for every position. WR, for example: often, a WR is tasked with reading the coverage on him. If the CB is off, run route A. If the CB is shading inside, run route B. If the CB is in press, run route C. Sometimes, it is impossible to know whether a pick was caused by a bad throw or a…

What the fuck is this shit?

They didn’t even try to put forth a decent argument on irreparable harm. I’m guessing they will put a little more effort into it at CA5, but they just want Mazzant to deny so they can get to CA5 quicker. Also worth noting that NFL seems to be saying the CA5 would conduct “de novo” review (basically allowing CA5 to…

Did you read the decision? As an attorney that has obtained several injunctions, this was as close to a sure thing as a case can be. No chance CA5 overturns the injunction. The ultimate result is a different story maybe though.

It is really interesting. No problem.

The issue the 8th circuit rejected was whether fundamental fairness can be an independent ground to vacate an arbitration award. It held it cannot (and so does the 7th circuit). Basically, for CA7/8, you have to show some violation of the CBA first and then you must show that violation was fundamentally unfair. This…

You always seem level-headed in your comments. I think you’re getting this one wrong though. To me it seems like you don’t really think he didn’t take responsibility, he just didn’t utter magic words you wanted to hear from an alcoholic. You don’t know if he has taken steps to seek help. You don’t know if he does…

I was shocked when Berman overturned it as well. That was always almost guaranteed to be overturned by the second circuit. But this is different, imo. The main reason the second circuit reversed Berman—at least in regard to withholding evidence and refusing to make certain people available to testify—was that the…