malcomwarner--disqus
Malcom Warner
malcomwarner--disqus

Maher was way too easy on Milo in the interview, but inviting him on the show did help de-mystify his whole persona. Milo's fame is entirely based on the fact that students try to get him banned from campus every time he's invited to speak. He's become "The man liberals DON'T want you to be able to see!". All of these

..

The only reason the right wing embraced Milo and gave him a platform is because of his ability to trigger liberal outrage. Righties fucking love the fact that this guy attracts protests and event cancellations every time he sets foot on a college campus because it plays perfectly into their "liberals are trying to

Nikki and Natalya are both good wrestlers individually but they have fucking zero chemistry together. And Nikki's awful mic work hasn't helped either. This feud has been unwatchable.

Yeah, that's the joke. The guy is clearly gay but he and his family are in denial about it. Hilarious!

Slightly different. Austria and Germany had a long-intertwined ethnic and political history, and many Austrians (particularly in the military) considered themselves ethnic Germans and supported Austrian-German unification long before Anschluss.

Most Christians are also not white. One could just as easily accuse critics of Christianity as being "racist".

Your assessment of these events is straight out of talking points from RT. Forgive me for being suspicious that your criticism of Hillary Clinton's foreign policy record is motivated by a genuine concern for human rights and not something else, Comrade.

Is there a reason some people (especially in Hollywood) insist on using "racism" as a catch-all term for any type of prejudice or bigotry? First Ben Affleck called Sam Harris' critiques of Islam on the Bill Maher show "racist", now Lindsay Lohan is claiming that the headscarf thing is "racial profiling". This fucking

These talking points of yours are almost suspiciously pro-Russia…..

Your post is basically a barrage of slogans without any specifics.

With the exception of the Libya, I'm struggling to think of an example of Hillary being a military interventionist while SoS. She tended to favor diplomacy or non-military actions, and was generally fairly successful at it. Examples: START-IV, the Iran nuclear sanctions program, the Turkish-Armenian Accords, Burmese

Stephanie McMahon Kayfabe Logic:

It's rated "N" as in "Not suitable for childish pacifist dipshits who actually believe that it's possible to fight a war with zero civilian casualties and think that presidents deliberately bomb women and children just for funsies."

What specifically did you dislike about Hillary's tenures in the Senate and State Department?

She's a female Democrat. That's pretty much it. Plug any female Democrat (Nancy Pelosi, Diane Feinstein, Elizabeth Warren, whoever) into the presidential nomination and you will see the exact same hatred spew forth from the right wing.

What crimes? Benghazi? She should be executed because of a security fuckup at an embassy that got four people killed while she was Secretary of State?

I'd rather not.

I'm not saying prior federal experience guarantees a successful presidency, but it generally helps. Especially when the alternative is a guy with zero experience. Trump is the first president in American history who has neither served in the military nor held prior elected office. Every other president had done at

Barely. He got 53% of the white female vote, which is a historic low for a Republican candidate in the modern era. Republicans always win a majority of white women, because they always win a majority of white people in general. Trump did better with men and worse with women than Republicans typically do - Trump's