Considering it was analyzing his driving patterns over a long period of time? Your probably good. Not that false positives don't happen, but randomly crazing around a localized area is likely to common to be all that useful and thus shouldn't in and of itself be flagged.

Even if he had minor Russian Mafia connections, and they were active and willing to do something in that area; you think they are going to do a damned thing and jeopardize their operations after he shoots his mouth off like that?

They do seem to lose though (pride, GDP, stability, :P).

Not sure race has much to do with people believing it’s a hoax.

So, they think consumers are more likely to properly recycle or dispose of batteries?

She may not know. But that's on her. Allegations about him have been public knowledge for years.

Depending on what was used a number of cleaning agents are fairly common in cleaning agents. I'm more surprised she knew how to handle it without burning herself.

They can do that to most courts. SCOTUS can still likely interpret and rule on it. Under the limits section.

Doesn’t seem like a super odd term for them to use. Hasn’t medical tourism been a thing for years (generally rich people from other countries coming here for more advanced care (i.e. the Shaw of Iran)).

“Congress can act and pass the laws that would enshrine any right that the Supreme Court strips away.”

I think I saw it on CNN and this is the first story about it that I saw here.

“ undermine the protections of Constitutional statutory warrant requirements”
Has any US court ruled that social media activity is actually protected privacy? I didn’t think a court decision or law had spread the wire tap protections to Social Medias.

The 14th ammendment applies to government services, laws, and the like. The civil rights acts out of the early 60s and 70s are what effect hiring by private companies.

This seems like the article version of a meeting that could have been an email.

Yeah, I don’t see it happening. Heck, can't even convince yhe court that it should have more strenuous ethical standards.

Because he is. He isn’t that intelligent.

Maybe trust the low level management you hire to be able to manage your employees for minor shit like this and set mandatory time off prevent burnout?

Many do reoffend. But it’s fairly uncommon for released murderer to murder again. 

So fewer anti-machine learning articles that don’t ever defend their specific moral claims from someone who glosses over that Gawker only got killed by Thiel when they published non-consensual porn against a legal demand not to. Not to mention that Thiel only started attacking Gawker that way after Gawker decided to…

So, first off that blows and they should have been payed on time; no question.