As someone who doesn’t have a lot of time to play video games, I thought the length was pretty good too.

so is Outer Worlds 2 going to still be published by Take-Two or is microsoft taking over in full? cause I’m betting this shit wouldn’t have flown with Microsoft publishing considering how much effort they put into seamless cross-gen.

Step1 : steal cars

This reminds me of the team of thieves who meticulously plan a $million jewelry heist and get away scot free, only to be caught the next day trying to sell diamond rings to strangers on the street.

The Dodge Challenger Hellcat theft from last week showed the drawbacks of selling very fast vehicles.

Such a professional job without a plan of what to do with the cars afterwards

Yeah. I’m US-ican born in 80 who grew up w/ JRPG only meaning RPG made by a Japanese company and Western RPG meaning ‘rent if you’re desperate’.

Yeah, there seems to be some sort of rewriting history that JRPG was always some sort of slur ?? I’ve never heard anyone use it that way , although seemingly ( nased on these articles) some Internet chuds did in the 2010s , anyone who ever used the term , even decades before said dick wads were born , is now worse…

It’s weird because growing up in Asia in the 90s, the term “JRPG” was a praise and has always meant a stamp of quality.

Actually…that’s a pretty good point 

And side note: who the FUCK is digging up 2006 game reviews to get angry about them!?

Says the website with a fake Japanese name.

Isn’t it sort of...i dunno, *implied* that anything from 2006 is going to be “of it’s time?” I’m not excusing the content of what’s said but like, gaming in the early 00' ain’t exactly the most inclusive hobby.

The legality thing seems really complicated and I wouldn’t know how to sort it out, I hope someone does. If the same laws apply to humans and ai, a lot of the stealing they do could be considered fair use by human standards.

What kind of bothered me most, specifically with the image you shared, was that someone made the artistic decision to linger on it for as long as they did in their video, framing it front and center, almost highlighting just how bad it looked.

They’re not the same arguments, because the context is different.

When did everyone suddenly go from insisting commercial art isn’t art, to insisting only commercial art is art?

“Animation is one of those jobs where you accept a much lower salary than you could make elsewhere, because you get to do what you love.”

No snark intended, but given that two of those three things basically permeates every single aspect of our lives, I’m not sure how you have any conversations...

How dare people want to make labour obsolete, obviously work is the only worthwhile endeavour.