Yeah, there’s no recusal for journalists/historians/other investigative types not in law enforcement because their work has no binding authority. The only ones who might have to take ethical considerations into account are the editors/managers who might nix a story because they themselves have ties to Weinstein—And…

Maddow had a really good A block touching on the water issue.

fi...finger his ballsack?

found that 45 percent of Republicans support giving courts the power to shut down “biased” media outlets

Depends on if they’re in a combat zone or not.

I get the feeling this one is going unreported to Trump out of fear he’ll stay on prompter.

I’m amazed at how he can just always be wrong. You can set your watch to it. Like Palin, only with somehow less coherence.

Tax cuts (largely for the wealthiest) obsession. Yeah, it’s still technically reform, I guess, but there’s something disingenuous about calling it reform.

Lol, no worries. My brain totally shorted a little while ago when talking about the NK ICBM situation and what was the closest target. Stupid me was picturing a 2d map and not thinking great-circle distance. Oops.

Just “accidentally” have it upside down during the presentation which “unfortunately” isn’t specific leaving the impression Donny is getting what he wants? I like it.

Just consider it training.

Oh damn! Missed the glasses. Good catch!

Ha ha, missed that double entendre. Thanks!

Looks like they tilted the Earths axis like it is relative to the Sun.

He’s gone after Trump well before today

I have a pit bull who has a borderline unhealthy fascination with his plushie deer, so the puppers with the duck resonates with me.

“Shhhh. Don’t tell him that”

Who? This guy?

Someone knows where the bodies are hidden and is in Trump’s corner (or is Trump). That’s the only reason I can think of.

Unfortunately yes. It’s usually parroted by the Vincent Adultman types, and common clay dupes who believe whatever is regurgitated to them from Republican propaganda.