Just like he people who were finding incredible things we wouldn’t believe in Hawaii.

I would make at least one purchase of every product that show advertised for a year if someone did that.

She’ll land with whatever Mercer backed canditate that can’t go 30 seconds without verbally defecating all over themselves once her stint is up.

It’s all misdirection. Most people get their insurance from their workplace, even more so if subsidies go bye-bye. Mid and high level coverage cost will remain pretty much the same, it’s all actuarial calculations. What the interstate purchasing does is allow employers who employ large levels of low wage earners in a…

That’s actually him June 15, 2015. I think we’re (hopefully) at the part where after the first wave where he yells out “YOU FUCKING MARICONS!”

I never was under the impression they weren’t. Just adding onto OP’s thought about how ludicrous Trump’s claim that the ACA “imploding” is intentional.

They seemed pretty gaga over the Putin shirtless horseback pics when they were pushing the Obama is a weak leader argument. It may be unrequited.

Too lazy to do the digging, but I bet you can find attack arguments from a few years ago about how the ACA was so unwieldy that nobody knew what was going on, not even Obama, and that was why we should repeal it.

I haven’t followed up on it, but Utah a few years ago was very aggressive about housing the poor and seeing positive effects from it. Could be what you’re thinking of.

My take is that it is basically financial shell games to cause premiums to go down in the short term. Medical costs will keep going up which will cause them to rise in the future, but the gambit seems to be to put something in place to show an instant impact to premium prices and bank on voters to be shortsighted and…

There’s a major intellectual dishonesty going on here and not getting called out with how they are pushing the “choice is going to drive down cost” line. Whenever they bring up the talking point most have been saying it will bring down the cost of healthcare which is, well, wrong. What they are proposing is basically…

Chinese and maybe doesn’t include the vomit part, but “ku xiao bu de”

I’ll pray for you.

According to Hensley’s amendment, $450,000 in recurring funds would be “earmarked” for the “intellectual diversity” office. That money would be used for staff and programming, “including holding a minimum of four events on campus, per academic year, that allow for the discussion and debate of societal and…

That’s what you get in a world without women ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It’s a security blanket. The same way the travel ban is. And the promise of tariffs and the deregulation of coal production. Really fucking expensive (in more ways than monetarily) security blankets.

(Appearing to be concerned about) National security is a large concern for Trump’s administration

Much like irony, methinks Spicer needs a refresher on what obvious means.

I’m not completely up on all of the changes and was a little confused by the wording in your first paragraph. Has Iraq made or agreed to any policy changes in the past month since the first ban went into place? If so, what were they?

This assumes they view Islam as a religion.