Some woman (allegedly) thinking that a performance piece was license to sexually violate someone is further proof that we are in desperate need of public education on consent.

I could write this comment now or hours later and I think all I would have to write is:

Can I judge these schools because they hold twerking competitions for internships and simultaneously be appalled that that's what's called twerking in Czech Republic?

You'd frown too if you had santorum on your shoulder...

So? It's what you sign up for as a minority Republican. Trotted out to show that they aren't racist and to repeat their condemnation of minorities and then back into the shadows you go until they have use for you again.

One woman, No people of color

"I'm not perfect, but at 42 years old I can say that I've never even been drunk. I've never smoked or done any drugs. I'm as pure as pure can be."

God your GIF game is powerful.

She should have bitten Don Lemon.

I'm more disappointed that Kotaku would actively encourage people to commit fraud. I expect there to be people with lower morals in the world sad as it is.

People who help others cheat are gross and lack personal ethics. That's just a truth.

You're basically absolving your friend of any blame for being a shitty person.

Are you sure they're hitting on him, and not just relieved to be able to talk to a man who probably won't hit on them? As someone who is not the slightest bit interested in poaching, having my intentions misunderstood is something that really concerns me. (Of course, if his partner is right there, I'd be trying to…

Are we really sure he was saying feminism was make believe? I got the feeling he was saying that superheroes/movies are make believe. I think it is highly possible it isn't clear what he was referencing there.

I don't really know if "a conversation with [someone] about anything really deep" is what Taylor Swift looks for in public-facing friendships

Paying for exclusive access to customers should be illegal. Screw the taxi drivers that pay to be a part of a corrupt system.

A man who's been convicted of making illegal campaign contributions? Or perhaps the answer is "Dinesh D'Souza"? What do I win??

Ok, how about then taking the angle that this show should have never aired because of its promotion of narcissistic and insane pageant parents? I agree with the OP in this thread.

she was given a tv show, literally for being the disgustingly self involved mother of a tiny train wreck. that vote of approval for her personality and lifestyle contributes directly to the same delusion that allows her to say "i put my kids first" while dating someone who raped one of her kids.

Sorry, Drew, but I don't care how well you did. I'm not going to trust someone who got handwriting lessons from Christy Brown.