Neeerp. Not the bones.

>Saliva drying up into that webby gunk

Speaking as a man, on a blog called "Celebrity sex, fashion for women" can we never ever begin a sentence with "Speaking as a man...." ever again? Thanks.

Just reimagine it as this. It helps.

This is the best morning coffee thread ever.

I like the gif of him passing out.

Sure thing.

You didn't connect pollution, or recycling, for that matter, to your point. You drew increasingly long "everyone knows" connections to things. That's why I don't think you understand your own point.

There isn't a "right" in selling someone a printer, as long as you aren't ripping them off or something.

No, you've just repeated your feelings over and over, which I do not care about. Back your proposal with evidence, or go away. I don't care how you feel it ought to be, unless you can demonstrate a change is warranted through evidence. You are just pissy your shitty printer doesn't work anymore because people don't…

The system works according to market forces. Until technological advancement in consumer goods changes, people are going to continue to want a new cellphone every few years. People are sold computers on how fast and cutting edge they are. Until people stop wanting cutting-edge products, designing them to last forever…

None of these things run or require outside programming work.

Can you cite your data?

The point was the "should" wasn't backed with data on why it would be an improvement over the current system, in quantifiable terms.

Re: The Backpack.

Again, you just made ideological based arguments rather than ones grounded in reality. we are discussing what works, not how you wish it was.

My point is we are now 15 years out of date. That clock does not reset every time you purchase a product.

All of these complaints are for the manufacturers of said devices, not Microsoft. I say again, for how many years is a company required to task software engineers to work on products that create no net income for the company?