"If the stable provider relationship she has causes her to take a punch every now and then, but on the overall she likes it, what's the problem?"
See the issue here? This very attitude, whether she's "happy" with it or not, is helping continue abusive attitudes and relationship modelling in the world.
A child bride may…
m4nt3
m4nt3
If you validate your relationship through insecurity and control of your partner, you are a shitty person. Full stop.
If you cloak it in "cultural norms" or "tradition" you are a disingenuous, shitty person who probably recognizes the cognitive dissonance of what you profess to believe and what you do.
If you defend…
That's not a compelling argument
"His insecurity is just so masculine. I love it."
Shockingly, weak people let people subjugate them. News at 11.
OK. Cast=/= forged. Think of a cake. You can pour the ingredients together and bake it, but without the extra step of mixing it, introducing the air, the texture is off and your cake sucks.
In the same way, forging distorts the crystalline structure of the metal, imparting specific properties. It's not about the…
I wish I could star this a thousand times.
"while countries with rates above 15% were considered to
So you can arbitrarily decide whether something is necessary or not by just declaring it so statistically. Cool, I guess we don't need doctors anymore.
*SIgh*
He hyperbolically implied the antivaxxers were the people as the home birth people. You asked for evidence, and a greek chorus pointed to data that, yeah, the same sort of antiscience people flock together. Then you say that's not what you are asking, you need evidence that they are exactly the same (in the…
....But you are treating the possibility of a surgical scar with equal weight as the death of your freaking child.
I do know this, in fact, I was quoting you. It's cool that you can be deliberately obtuse about hyperbole in comments on the internet.
>Jezebel getting laughed at for yet again posting internet rumor and viral stunts as fact
I wonder how many times it can happen before you hire people with the qualifications to back the material they comment on?
You know an "exact overlap" is an impossible statistical claim to meet, so you demand it in all cases so you can still be "right".
So you are cool with doubling the chance of your baby dying because of your personal feelings? Cool.
But it once again boils down to accepting more risk to placate your personal discomfort with the current practices of modern medicine. Tell me how this is different than vaccine rejection.
Now you are just moving the goalposts when someone brought a gun to a knifefight, in the form of data.
Nope. You don't get to add arbitrary qualifications to still try to stay on top when you have data that directly flies in the face of your claim.