See my previous reply and example, unless this comment is you asking for me to re-explain the same concept in simpler terms?

For the record I’m not saying Elon is perfect, or that I even agree with how he runs Twitter. I’m just pointing out Collin completely contradicting himself. But then the liberals have jumped on…

This was covered on a previous comment, but Jalopnik is censoring the crap out of this thread, (ironic.)

This is a great example of statistics painting a skewed perspective. Prior to Elon taking over Twitter, their team met with govt officials regularly, and then implemented a stategy of banning, and de-platforming…

You’re trying to make a point here, but for the life of me I have no idea what it is.

You mean you didn’t understand my argument? Here I’ll explain it more simply for you:

My original post points out how the author blatantly contradicts themselves. (Please let me know if you need me to explain HOW they contradicted themselves, as it’s clear you are struggling.)

Then I gave evidence as to why they…

Part of that increase is because they now are forced to make official requests in order to have something removed. (And they aren’t requesting things they know won’t get removed.) Previously they were having regular conversations and guiding Twitter employees who were then censoring things as they found them, without…

That’s a ridiculous reach. Saying that one side isn’t all good, and one side isn’t all evil, is stating they are the same? That leap of logic is so bafflingly bad, I’m not sure why I’m even responding to it. It’s clear debate, logic, and likely even reading comprehension aren’t your strong suits. Stick to crayons in…

That’s basically everyone then, including yourself.

I never said they were the same. Go play in traffic. 

A common response created from Dunning-Kruger.

Pro Tip, when you attack the persona and not the argument, you are admitting defeat in said debate.

I haven’t voted GOP in the presidency in 20 years, but no the Democrats do not police their own, thats a laughable statement.

I didn’t say Elon wasn’t a hypocrite, I just showed that you proved yourself one, along with being logically incorrect.

Holy contradicting yourself:

“The right to free speech means the government can’t arrest you for what you say. It doesn’t mean that anyone else has to listen to your bullshit or host you while you share it.”

Then you (and Adam) immediately argue that Elon censoring people he doesn’t like and kills free speech? Talk…

Can not do this! 

Ford helping everyone find free drugs! That’s how I’m taking this.

EV trucks, literally the last passenger vehicle we should be electrifying. 

Can I place bets on this 10x? I’m taking the under.

Teenagers have access to all sorts of things, and a car is something they can legally drive. I repeat, they can legally drive a car. So you are putting forth the argument that people have to hide anything/everything a teenager could use to hurt, kill or endanger someone. I wonder if you have kids, because using your…

A 16 year old is only a child if they are a victim of a crime, otherwise they are regularly charged as an adult in serious crimes.

“Would you really prefer a society that parents have absolutely no legal responsibility to take very basic measures to stop a child with a multi-year history of violence & social danger…

She didn’t give him permission, he took the car keys. Next thing after this will be kitchen knives, or hammers, or a shovel from the shed. Parents will have to nerf their entire existence to not risk litigation if their teenager, (who for most of human history was already an adult.) from doing something stupid,…

My concern is the expansion of charging parents for anything their teenagers do. (The fact that same teenager can’t be charged as an adult is just to show how asinine it is.) First it was guns, now it’’ll be keeping car keys locked up, then they’ll move on from there, maybe the next thing will be knives, or hammers,…