Obviously. Once you stop sucking off your parent’s financial teet, the idea of wanting to keep as much of your money as possible sounds a lot more reasonable.

Hippies.

Studies have shown that young people tend to move away from socialism once they enter the workforce.

You misspelled “hot dog fingers.”

Will you accept all the trades that Danny Ainge insists he could’ve made?

Let’s trade Albert to get Ashley back.

I want to live on whichever planet has the least amount of liberals and the most amount of anarchists.

Inequality is always going to exist, in some form. I can’t think of any society where everyone was truly on the same level. What we should be focusing on is muting the impacts of that inequality, removing some of the systemic biases that influence inequality, and providing clearer avenues to class mobility.

I think that makes it even more creepy. Who the hell watches porn outside the context of jacking off?

“I want higher taxes for everyone who makes $1 more than I do.”

As always, the poor want YOUR money, too, Hamilton.

You. Are. High. Seriously, this is the most insane, class-warfare-y thing I’ve ever read. If your entire argument is to take money away from anyone who’s doing well to redistribute it to the poor, then why would anyone ever want to work hard and make money?? Ok, so you start at the billionaires, then what? Then…

The primary fallacy in this argument is this though: This assumes that the person in question didn’t also pay in to the roads, to the schools, to the police and the fire department. They paid in as well. So, negating that, it boils back down to the same thing. I should have their money because I want it.

It’s not a zero-sum, either-or world, Nolan. Museums contribute to the collective good and cultural enlightenment of humanity, and the homeless can obtain a vodka-choco-tini and chicken-pesto panini at the Met Roof Garden for $39.50. All thanks to the generosity of billionaires.

Seriously, can any of you even imagine a world in which poor people got to eat but we didn’t have Vanderbilt university? Then who would come in last in the SEC?

But some of us don’t really like socialism. And we’re not even billionaires. Or even millionaires.

Does anyone else that follows Deadspin on Twitter find that they can always identify Nolan’s articles just by the headline?

Sometimes, I get the feeling that HamNo leans a little to the left.

So by this logic a street junkie with nothing but a pair of semi-moistened underpants to his name should be able to walk into your middle class home and help himself because, to him, you have far more than anyone could ever possibly need.

Do we take their money before or after we eat them?