lyogin
lyogin
lyogin

I have no reason at this time to dispute that we have a very good idea who created the list.

I have no reason at this time to dispute that we have a very good idea who created the list.

I have no reason at this time to dispute that we have a very good idea who created the list.

We know of someone who claims to have created it, yes. Are you going to put on your big girl pants and dare to read the comment section of this article?

Yes of course I dispute them. If we know who created the list, it’s come out since this article was written. You can’t possibly know the consequences for whoever is on the list without doing a deep dive in their lives.

But hey, keep up with the assumptions!

The list was sent to you in a reply to one of your comments.

You know everyone that created and contributed to the list? You know everyone that’s received and forwarded the list to someone else? You know how every single person who was named on the list got on the list? Who put it there, and why they decided to put a name there?

Bullshit. You don’t have a source for that. If

See the actual quote is “So let’s find out who created and who added to the “Shitty Men in Media” list to see if their words are outing actual perpetrators, or if they’re dragging innocent men’s reputations through the mud”

Ohh look I didn’t say the men on this list were innocent, I just pointed out that we don’t

Where have I once said anyone on this list was innocent? That never happened. Go ahead and quote me on that. Prove me wrong. I’ll save you the trouble. It doesn’t exist. For all I know every word on the list could be true, but we don’t have any way of knowing that or even attempt to verify the claims made with the

Well at least one of them does have a 50 micron filter. That’s a fact. Trust my authority. You really need to get your eyes checked or just accept that you’re not nearly as good at you think you are at eyeballing the effectiveness of filters, and their impact on airflow.

My filters affect airflow by about 12% according

1. I don’t know if they’re innocent. Do you know they’re guilty of the acts this list claims they committed? If you do, I would love to see your evidence. Until then I’m not going to make an assumption
2. Potentially anyone on the list could be as innocent as humanly possible. That’s the challenging thing about these

I didn’t say the alleged sexual abusers are the real victims. We do not know who the victims are. What you think just because someone ends up on a list from an anonymous source they’re automatically guilty of what they’ve been accused of? That’s ridiculous. But can’t you agree that the reputations of these men have

I don’t care what those filtration levels “look to be to you”. Some of these cases I showed you use nylon filters that are rated to filter out anything above 50 microns. My NZXT case has dust filters on it capabile of filtering out anything over 100 microns. You actually do not know jack shit, and are speaking out of

It *was* privately disseminated. It is *now* publicly published, just like literally anything on the internet can be at any time if someone chooses to do so. It doesn’t matter what the authors and contributors intentions are. It doesn’t matter at all. Creating a list of this nature automatically damages the reputation

No you weren’t. Your claimed credentials are meaningless.

Do you know the micron filtration level of any of those filters? No. Did I ever claim any of these dust filters stop 100% of dust? No. Did you establish that in an typical environment, the dust that gets past any of these filters can have a dramatic impact on

Ohh wow. That totally hurt me right in the fee fees! Great job!

No go on back to Jezebel and read carefully and concentrate real real hard so you can figure out what your opinion is supposed to be about the news today!

The person who published the list doesn’t matter, the same way it didn’t matter for James Damore. James Damore, the creator and sole editor of the document was the person that mattered. So let’s find out who created and who added to the “Shitty Men in Media” list to see if their words are outing actual perpetrators,

An anonymous source. It doesn’t matter. It’s the internet. It’s anonymous.

So now I have to explain how dictionaries work to you? Lets go over it

“2 a : to disseminate to the public
b : to produce or release for distribution;

It doesn’t matter who disseminated it, and no one said it has to be distributed in print. It’s 2018, there’s this thing called “the internet”. It can easily be found on the internet because some random published it on the internet.

Why is this so hard for you?

I see you’ve chosen to keep expressing the same point in different ways.