??? When did I ever say that it's because he is gay? Please don't put words in my mouth. I pay serious attention to homophobia and I never talk to anyone who promotes such idea. It is a gross generalization, however, that if an actor is openly gay, then we should all never criticize him.

there's a difference between unrealistic and flawed, and just sexist and misogynistic.

Things like this will be much easier when people stop using words like "boyish" "girly" "feminine" and "masculine" to describe completely patriarchal ideals

I don't know why some people haven't caught on this yet, but talking about how someone is below or above someone is extremely derogatory, because you are saying some human beings with certain jobs and accomplishments are better human beings than others. Let's seriously think before we speak.

We seriously should stop tolerating sexism or homophobia, under any religious or cultural excuses. Just because there is religious or cultural history behind it doesn't make it right.

If you think Nicki Minaj is sexuality is same as porn, yeah, great. You really shouldn't have kids either. Thank goodness I never wanted kids, so I don't have to expose them to puritanical shamers like you who disguise themselves as feminist but won't endorse sex-positivity. Yes, naked women - not porn. Nicki's…

What's wrong with showing skin and sexually loaded songs? And why wouldn't I want Nicki Minaj as a role model? She is comfortable with her sexuality, which I count as a good trait. You are nitpicking which sexuality is acceptable and which isn't, which I cannot agree with as someone who is supposedly feminist would do.

Agreed with everything you said but kind of ironic that you are critiqueing other people's comments for being sexist when your own comment assumes that anybody who "shows skin" and wants to have sex appeal are not good role models... which is also an sexist assumption. There is nothing wrong with loving sex and…

Not even close, girl. Not even close. Haha!

It is fun for me to, to get to know people that way - except that I wouldn't spread things that are obviously untrue around for fun, because that would be a lie, you know. Everybody charges a different amount, but I don't read for people I know because it messes with objectivity - and if I have to, I'll give them a…

Officially, as in I charge people for it. But I never do this kind of you're a taurus and you are this and you will meet a tall dark stranger! Thing. I think playing with people's money and time that way, with vague generalizations, is wrong.

I am - and these tauruses are this and libras are nice shit really bugs me, so I couldn't help but comment. It's exactly why people rant about how that generalization doesn't work - because it doesn't work. It's easy to lure people in, but it's not true.

Every single person is born with a unique birth chart, and your chart is not the same as anybody else in this whole world. Not even twins have the same birth chart. That's why these horoscopes, sun-sign related, virgos will have a great week and all tauruses are lazy, shit will never, ever work. You need an astrologer…

Okay. As a lifelong astrologer these generalizations bug me. This sun-sign, libras are this and scorpios are that BS, is NOT how astrology works. It's exactly why people who don't know anything about astrology give it a bad rep.

For the record, I dislike Sarah Palin and how unsupportive she is of women and contraception, because I do think of that as anti-feminsm in some way - because she isn't just personally choosing what she is comfortable with and being OK with that, she is advocating and forcing people to think in a puritanical way and…

I'm sorry too but it seems like you are trying to dismiss every account I am mentioning because you love NPH, which irks me. He had tweeted, which I have seen, in defense of Richardson and how everybody is bugging him about it when it's no big deal, then deleted it when it got bad. He has, when people started giving…

I totally agree with you Emma - but I draw a line at defending sexual predators who assault people, or making fun of dead people's corpses. Which NPH is happy to do, without shame.

So if someone gives a pass to a sexual predator, and that person does other great things, it makes it OK in your book. Like American Apparel keeping a CEO as a consultant after his sexual abuse, but it's okay cause they're sweatshop free. I do not doubt his great acts for the queer community, but that does not make…

I'm not sure why you replied to me, because I would never say to anyone that they are too hetero, and I pay very close attention to heteronormativeness. I was half in jest when I mentioned blacklisting, but I am sick of hollywood and the media giving passes to horrible people just because they did one good thing. It…

Is there any way Jezebel can have like, a blacklist of seriously racist/sexist/horrible people so you can be consistent throughout the website about who to praise? I feel like this article comes off as giving him more precious media time, letting people like and praise him. It makes me feel so icky about the world.