TOTALLY! Not to mention the actual functionality of breasts and the fact that women often get shamed for using them to feed their infants because TOO SEXY! Trust me when I say that plopping out my boob for my son felt completely unsexy. This book contributes to that in the long term.

Firstly, no.

There are much better ways of putting it like...

If anything, it’s the opposite. Women have breasts to feed babies, but it’s an evolutionary advantage for men to find women attractive and vice-versa. Add to that the sexualization of breasts over centuries to a ridiculous extent and you get to where we are today.

Boobs, which are mainly fat, are also useful because a woman needs a certain amount of fat to have a menstrual cycle.

No. Just because some people find breasts attractive, that is not what they are for. Women grow breasts in order to feed children. That we as a society have sexualized a body part doesn’t change why it exists. No woman chooses to grow boobs, it just happens. You’re saying that the symptom defines the purpose. This…

I had a mastectomy two weeks ago and so am a wee bit more conscious of breasts than I was before. I admit I am both amused flummoxed by this. Girls get boobs to be attractive? Does it say later that boys develop something similar for similar purposes? The mind boggles.

How are they ‘promoting mutual respect and understanding’ by saying girls get tits to be attractive? That’s literally promoting the sexualization and objectification of women’s bodies.

Nothing says “limited government” like giving tanks and grenade launchers to the police.

Master Race™️ by Noxema

Dude has too much head for his face, or not enough face for his head.

The Master Race® strikes again! Look at that little piggy nose! tee-hee

It sounds like Lorre took half of Grace and Frankie—namely, Frankie and her son Bud—and made it terrible.

Right. The bit about having cut open the torso in certain ways to make sure the decomposition gasses escaped so that she wouldn’t float means he’s spent some time thinking about this, at a minimum, and has learned some things from previous murders at a maximum.

While there always has to be a first, he did seem to know a lot of forensic countermeasures. My guess is this is not his first murder, regardless of the circumstances.

How many other people do you think he’s killed and cut up? You don’t do that just once.

Jesus. The theory that he sexually assaulted her, she resisted, and he murdered her and then has been desperately trying to cover his tracks ever since seems almost certain at this point. That, or he’s a deranged serial killer who’s really bad at covering his tracks.

I forgive her because she lived through sixteen years of her husband being lauded as a feminist god friend and champion paragon on virtue while he was actually screwing around on her. I would be pretty pissed off too.

Yeah? Feminists blame the beautiful, needy, aggressive young women for their affairs?

You obviously don't get it.