I totally agree. It doesn’t pass the smell test.

The sad catch-22 of Green Party candidates today: you want to vote for the ones who are pragmatic about fixing our country’s problems, but those are ones who realize they should drop out.

I know, and the professor is right to be afraid of an online troll storm. It’s scary how these days a simple facebook like can be silent but deadly.

Three more articles and he’ll look like Belloq opening the Ark.

He’s probably groping for reasons why he was benched. Maybe if defenses weren’t so handsy.

It was Petermanesque, which is the worst thing I can think of to say about it.

This is not about the unwritten rules that are often (correctly) derided. “Stop intentionally kicking other humans” is not the same kind of rule as “don’t watch your homer too long lest you hurt the pitcher’s feelings.”

The world is labyrinth, myriad gradations of truth abound, and the answer is both.

They really want to sign Harper this offseason and want him to feel at home.

Well holy shit.

What are they hiding?

Give them credit for drawing First Blood.

Does he want to come to the Bears? I’m sure we have some draft picks we haven’t traded away yet.

I heard the world’s suppliers of tattoo ink support Kaep.

Uhh....helping to arrange the passage of the abolition of slavery doesn’t make him...an abolitionist? Okaay.

This is perfect. Thank you.

What is it called when an actual news article should really be an Onion article? This phenomenon should have a name besides just “2018.”

“Even so, Lincoln was not an abolitionist nor pretended to be.”

“Lincoln was not an abolitionist”

Sorry, thought that was clear. I don’t agree with the assumption that Lincoln’s true beliefs were what he said in the debates. What a politician will say to score political points is often not representative of their true beliefs. I don’t think that idea is close to controversial.