"All they did was teach her that her emotions are dangerous and need to be repressed and lock her away for her whole adolescence! Nothing like abuse!"
"All they did was teach her that her emotions are dangerous and need to be repressed and lock her away for her whole adolescence! Nothing like abuse!"
They had the Aladdin ones going since '94.
hell yes!
Miles was so fudgin creepy
no, the term POC isn't a straight replacement for "minority"—it's about being non-white, not non-majority. because (due to Western cultural hegemony) pro-white bias exists in places where white people are not the majority (which she specifically mentions).
I just couldn't get past the IQ AND EQ ARE LINEAR SPECTRUMS IN DIRECT OPPOSITION DONT WORRY IN WAYS YOURE SMARTER THAN THE GENIUSES thing, plus the main guy throwing out his IQ (which he should know is a pretty futzy and not super meaningful measure but mostly is just obnoxious) all the time. it was like every two…
You meant Emma Roberts, not Niecy Nash, right? Getting On has Niecy Nash.
I think MonsieurT was referring to Emma Roberts, not Niecy Nash.
"I didn't vote for you" killed me. Very The Good Wife.
I'd upvote this but tbh Cisco was real gross at the beginning of the show
Wait, who's the fourth?
(Though she never felt him kick!)
nooooo izombie's going short again? :(
Would it negate that? Would him coming back make make her unlearn to let go? I agree that it would be a cop out, but I don't think it would have bearing on Emma's past character development.
maybe Hades took the pen's name off a tombstone?
Loved Dirk Gently. Wish they made more!
Definitely thought for a thrilling few minutes that his "I'll help them find their unfinished business" was how they were writing him off.
Also, what if she thought removing her heart from the scale would be what saved Hook, rather than… tackling him? It makes a lot more sense. Would the scale have been like "Well, you didn't choose him right"?
And Lexa got way better treatment than this.
He never said Limitless didn't get enough readers. He was only saying that grades and comments are not reliable evidence from which to assume the amount of readership.