deserts is correct— the word in the idiom means "things you deserve," not "post-meal sweets"
lujk
lujk--disqus
it's on the cw website
Terriers! The wound is still fresh.
like she is also an actress who does voice work because why the hell would they not capitalize on her voice work? other than that it's not her at all.
this is also a character
and chrome!
Right, I wasn't disagreeing with that, I just don't think it was necessarily supposed to be tragic because she can't have kids— I didn't think the show was really portraying her as wanting to have a kid, just wanting what having a kid represented (Ioan Gruffudd/that fantasy of escape and control and happiness he…
The last one seemed to me like they liked each other.
Yes— based on the dates they gave, I think the arrival in Paris, when she's already pregnant, was two years before she returns to the 1940s.
Not emotions generally, just expressing her own. It's not that subjective, just subtextual. But I agree that it's not getting anywhere.
Believing something is not the same as enacting it perfectly.
Right, Let it Go was the turning point in that arc. She was afraid of being emotional in front of anybody and had to go be a hermit in order to feel free to express herself without fear of hurting others. Then at the end of the movie she learns she can do both.
She did, despite trying very hard not to, and felt shame afterwards.
I wasn't getting all that from the one line, though it does fit. I was getting it from the entire first two acts of the film.
You're right, there is no way she's not going to be able to show any emotion as a human being. That's why it's abuse when people are taught that. This isn't a hypothetical thing that we're imagining could happen, it happens, and it was depicted in this movie.
Your argument is that the line "emotions are dangerous" was never spoken??? You're like Drax the Destroyer in your level of literalism.
Eh, my aunt had her first kid at 47. But anyway she explicitly didn't assume it—first she was like "I probably can't have kids anymore," then she went for a test before trying. Being upset to hear it for sure still makes sense without assuming you could.
So it's okay to lock up a child from the outside world as long as they can still leave their room? And um yes, her powers are pretty much a straight-up metaphor for/activated by her emotions—her whole arc is about letting herself express her emotions again after having suppressed them because she was taught they were…
agreed except for choosing Jerry Seinfeld.