They need to require lights on top of people who use cell phones in their cars. (Think, people who have caused texting while driving accidents.)

Hollywood figured this one out a long time ago

ahhh a fellow Jalop

Being a military installation in the middle of nowhere, they could safely get away with that.

Corvette would like a word with you...

3rd Gen Trans Am gets my vote,

Obligatory. Vector Aeromotive.

I was...

The Leaf is no looker, but it is cheap.

Because it’s Jalopnik. It doesn’t have a Japanese badge, so it’s immediately a piece of shit. Duh.

agreed

rut roo prepare the antiaircraft gun firing squad

Bump Series 1 C4!

I’ve always considered it the poster child for why we shouldn’t EVER DO THIS for convertible or targa-top cars.

The new Camaro SS puts down similar numbers to the GT350, I can’t wait to see what a next gen Z28 can do.

Have to protect the dumb consumers, the guys building their own presumably know what they’re getting in to.

If you have a VIN you can get a car insured, and if you have liability insurance, you probably won’t be going to jail or even getting towed. Inspectable? Id agree with you there, but some polycarbonate and legit lights, this would be fully inspectable/registerable in Texas. I believe it.

God bless America.

Sad thing is, most of those big cars weigh about what a typical midsize does today because of all the junk in modern cars.