The answer to your questions are:

The guy that runs Fark, wrote a book called; It’s Not News, It’s Fark: How Mass Media Tries to Pass Off Crap as News. It includes a chapter titled, “Equal Time for Nutjobs,” about how the media likes to give the opposite side of a story, even when it’s proven to be untrue for “the conversation,” when really they’re…

Well, good. Wakefield can go peddle his double-down propaganda piece on fringe cruises and to the tinfoil-hat crowd. The Tribeca Film Festival risked their reputation screening this dreck, and it seems that finally sank in.

Totally. Even the only person who has ever met her from Gawker media has said that. Although I do think her personality shows through a lot more than it used to. But people are far too begrudging to acknowledge.

By all accounts, in private or in small settings she can be the total opposite of how she’s portrayed- funny and personable. It’s just that years and years of dealing with sexist takedowns, a media that intensely dislikes her, and 30 years worth of Republican shittiness to her has made her afraid to actual show any of…

That meme is all over Facebook these days- “EVERYONE OF MY FACEBOOK FRIENDS IS VOTING FOR BERNIE SO IT MUST BE THE CORPORATE OLIGARCHY THAT IS KEEPING HIM FROM WINNING!!!” The fact that there might be people who don’t live in there Bernie Bubble world never occurs to them.

“People are allowed to not like Hillary. It’s like you don’t get it.”

Being caught admitting Hillary Clinton can be funny and cool under pressure is just so unhip, apparently.

The senate hearings were amazing, but seem to have been forgotten. Why wouldn’t anyone want a leader that strong and graceful under pressure?

The thing that gets me are these comments:

“I won’t vote for a Clinton or a Bush.”
“Watching Hillary’s speech. God save me from her.”
“Hillary Clinton is a war-monger!”

Yeah, I wouldn’t go far as to say my brothers idolize Bill (probably because they’re not old enough to be especially nostalgic about his presidency), but they certainly don’t hold him to the impossibly high standard that they do Hillary, There’s no way gender is not a factor there.

There are about a billion valid criticisms of Hillary Clinton but she is very funny. It’s pretty universally acknowledged by people who’ve met her (including those who dislike her like David Axelrod) that she has a great sense of humor. But she’s funny in public too (like her reactions to the Senate hearings or her…

“Not just because watching Hillary Clinton try to be funny and cool is cringe-worthy” I must have watched a different video! How long did you spend writing this article? I thought she was great. I guess we have evolved from 2008 when we couldn’t stop talking about her looks...

She absolutely has the right to do whatever she wants with her appearance, and also to expect that no one will be rude to her because of it, but she can’t expect that people won't notice that she looks radically different. If it was subtle "has she or hasn't she"-surgery, then she could also expect that no one would…

People sometimes do it for medical reasons - the eyelids tend to get heavier as you age. (Which can interfere with sight.)

In all fairness, it might not have been just a desire for round eyes; the eyelids could have been starting to impair her vision (or would have eventually started to). My stepmom’s doctor said she could likely get an eye lift actually covered by insurance because her lids (she’s southeast Asian, and her eye shape is…

It’s called an upper bleph. It’s surgery to the upper eyelid involving dissection of the fat and muscle above the eye and below the eyebrow. She had naturally heavy lids and they removed a lot of the fat (a mistake, if you ask me—her eyes were cool that way) and moved the muscle. She’s still beautiful, she just looks…

Can anyone actually pin point what is different here though? I’m not disputing that she looks different, just can’t figure out how? Is it the hooded eyes? Has she had something done to her lids?

You can’t do this and expect people to ignore it