Not a social justice warrior. Just someone who would happily rip off your peg leg off and beat you with it, given the chance. There’s your code of ethics, cuck. There are dozens of tech blogs online that don’t offend yuur puur widdle teatard sensibilities...find one and fuck off to it.

Desperate need for acceptance by others but total inability to engage on a human level.

Pray tell, what the fuck are you doing here then?

“Our too-young and too-new America, lusty because it is lonely, aggressive because it is afraid, insists upon seeing the world in terms of good and bad, the holy and the evil, the high and the low, the white and the black; our America is frightened of fact, of history, of processes, of necessity. It hugs the easy way…

I come here for the whiny comments of butt hurt Trumpsterfireboys

Remember, Musk has his eyes on Mars.

Funny you say that because its staticly more likly that your kids will kill you than a stranger breaking into your home, and wastly less from an actual terrorist. I know its not a popular or cool opinion, but we really should ban kids.

There hasn’t been a single refugee that has committed an act of terrorism. You want to be safe, don’t eat read meat, don’t drink, don’t smoke and definitely don’t drive or be anywhere near a car. Refugees are the least of your worries.

Hi! Norway here. We know all about road tunnels. Call us!

Regardless we need a much better vetting process than what Obama had in place.

Nothing about this is “right”. This is wrong by every moral and legal standard we have in this country.

I know you’re saying that as an analogy, but it doesn’t really work. They are not coming in to live with your family, if you don’t want them, don’t! I know as much as I understand the pain they face, I am not comfortable with anyone staying at my place unless I know them!

But the people being detained are not complete…

After the limp-wristed statement by the ESA, it is nice to see a developer come out like this. Hopefully more of the AAA’s do this.

Hope more dev teams start doing this

I think you’re right that it’s a question of semantics, but I’d call a ban that *targets* Muslims, even if it’s not all Muslims, a “Muslim ban.” The one thread running through the seven countries targeted is that they’re majority-Muslim. (You could say “well aren’t they all dangerous, currently?” and the answer would…

Think of it this way. If I was king of BIG LIBERAL CITY, USA, and I said “all chain restaurants that serve hamburgers are banned,” would you call that a “fast food ban”? You could still go to a corner store or a mom-and-pop shop and order a hamburger and fries, but I definitely *targeted* fast food establishments as…

Because it’s a ban that affects only Muslims. Those seven nations are majority-Muslim, but the order specifically directs executive agencies to favor exemptions to the ban for people from “minority religions” (read: Christians) in those countries.

Just because it doesn’t ban every Muslim doesn’t mean it’s somehow not a…

This executive order has messed a lot with some students and colleagues I know, who have either student or work visas to come into this country. A friend of mine can’t go home to visit because he’d be unable to return.