I'm fairly certain that the Venn diagram of 1) dudes who bleat about how women should be wary of situations where they may not be control, 2) dudes who take extreme offense to the suggestion that women don't know if they intend harm, and 3) dudes who complain about stuck-up bitches not wanting to respond to strange…

you can tell when a girl is into it.

And that's why I'm, in all seriousness, worried for you. The tone of your posts is such that it wouldn't be surprising to see them on the news after a shooting spree. You are enjoying your anger and contempt to a worrying extent.

You rapidly go from blaming people in general for treating women like children, to then saying that women act like children and have no responsibility. You have a very unhealthy attitude about women, and you should do something about it. Getting angry on every post about violence against women is literally the last…

I've made out with guys that I deeeeefinitely had 0000000 intention of having sex with...I think that happens often enough.

Rape isn't always a violent struggle.

Yes, I realize this. The headline which says rape, is contradictory to the description of events, which says sex.

Reality is we need to be teaching people that if they don't have a yes...it's a no. Otherwise you end up with situations where someone is clearly to drunk to be having sex...but they're also too drunk to say no.
We've tried the no means no mantra, and it led to one in five women being sexually assaulted. Let's try the…

Really? Cause I would think that the first time would be when you would want to be the most sure that everyone involved was enthusiastic.
I feel like if there's any question there, you probably shouldn't be doing what you're doing. You should never have to wonder afterwards if she wanted to, because if you're…

Was she not screaming theatrically enough for you?

Right. That's because sex education sucks in this country and is why we've been saying we need to teach people not to rape.
If you don't have a yes...it's a no.
And if someone says 'no' or 'not tonight' or 'I'm not sure' stop fucking talking. It's the end of the discussion.

Oh, for God's sake. Yes, you are fucking victim-blaming.

Kids need to be taught how to use protection. They need to be taught how to avoid STDs. They need to be taught how sex works, and how impregnation works. WHY the hell do people somehow think they DON'T need to be taught how to respect each others' bodies? Study after study has found both boys AND girls grow up with…

I'll add this—if he was honest-to-god too drunk to think, "Gee, maybe I should ask if she wants to have to beyond making out now", I'll reserve condemning him as a vile monster, as opposed to a drunk dumbass.

I think the "as the two began having sex" in the second paragraph is a poor narrative because it makes it sound consensual, when the headline and the takeaway from the article is that this was a horrible public date rape. If it was rape then "as the two began having sex" is a completely inaccurate description of…

Alcohol for men: "Dude, he was drunk. He can't be held accountable for the stuff he did when he was drunk."

No point in blaming the victim. AGAIN. Ad nauseum.

Can we just say now, and get it out of the way, that the victim may have done things at the concert that were not A Good Idea, but that can not excuse or ameliorate criminal actions? Could we just for once not have that conversation?

"As the two began having sex" - I think you meant "As Murphy began sexually assaulting the 17-year-old girl..."

I assume, if one person had a small piece of mind to ask the girl if she "wanted this" ...she must not have looked like she was enjoying it. WTF was wrong with everyone else?