DLSS pretty consistently produces better image quality compared to FSR. In addition, frame generation is a godsend for poorly optimized games. For example, it’s the only way to achieve a locked 60 FPS in Jedi Survivor, a poorly optimized game that also happens to be AMD-sponsored. It has no official DLSS or frame…

It’s very much hate-it-or-love-it, yeah. Me and my girlfriend it hit like a truck, it’s one of my favourite horror movies. But man, if you’re not the kinda person whose brain sees a silhouette in a pile of clothes in a dark room you ain’t gonna get anything out of it.

Sorcerers definitely are into ATM atm.

I played the first one a while back and really loved it. I was going to pass on this one because I thought it was just a straight up remake and not like a remix of both games with the DLCs. So now I’m more interested in this one!

President Biden has always been such a Duke Nukem fanboy I bet you’re right.

Clearly the FTC saw Phil Spencer’s comment that it would be fun to make another Hexen game and were like, “We need to do everything we can to stop this.”

For me, 30 to 60 is very noticeable. 60 to 90 is also visually apparent. Anything higher than that and it’s diminishing returns (for me personally, based on the non-competitive types of games I play). My 144Hz monitor can “overclock” to 165Hz. I see no difference whatsoever.

That statement is simply wrong, if it was true people would not be seeing soap opera effect. Maybe you don’t see a difference - tbh, good for you. I often choose performance mode in games sacrificing visual fidelity because it does make a difference to me. The motion is visibly smoother. Is 30fps unplayable though?…

You should get your eyes checked. It is immediately noticeable. In fact, we *know* it’s immediately noticeable by the majority of people because we have a very good example of when a high-frame rate makes things worse - The hobbit. Not only did people immediately notice it, the majority of people absolutely hated the…

Of course he is. And we are free to call his opinion shit and to call your breathless defense of someone who wouldn’t piss on you if you were on fire a sad display by a pathetic simp.

Successful by what metric? This thing will be DOA. No chance it’ll ever see broad adoption at that price or anything close to it.

Pretty sure they proclaimed it was one of the “best shooters of 2023" and the writer’s favorites. Not one of the best games of 2023.

As an old guy with ADHD and occasional Red Bull drinker , I can say that I am not a fan of this map either .

Part of me is thinking ‘so the true villain is once again capitalism but you’re not saying anything constructive’ and the other part of me is thinking ‘the fucking onus is not on Luke Plunkett of Kotaku to prescribe anything to anyone’ so I guess I’m just exasperated. It’s hard to escape the consumer cycle for a lot…

im with you.  I mean the last game they released to universal acclaim was Skyrim...in 2011 and that game was broken on PS3.  They also have history of releasing buggy games on consoles.  FO3 hard crashed for me on 360....repeatedly.

Yes, it really should remove the feature so that day 1 consumers have no way of letting people know that a developer/publisher once again absolutely shat the bed releasing a product that doesn’t work.

I refuse to play games at 30 fps nowadays.

Feel like this guy was heading up the ideas for this from the Marketing dept.

One neat thing—and bear with me on this—is that the box doesn’t include instructions. Instead, you’ll print those out at home. Which sounds like a cheapskate decision, but really isn’t (small manuals are a negligible cost in game manufacturing vs cards, tokens, art, etc), because like they say it means “we can update…

Scroll past and move on