i’m definitely not a hardcore gamer, and i’m not bothered by these ‘busts’. what i am bothered by is how bland and boring the game is. the extent did not occur to me until i Loaded up Borderlands 2 to add some newly released SHiFT keys. on a whim i decided to spend a few minutes running around and shooting things and…

not to me. overwatch has a ridiculous kill box. i get headshots when i’m actually TRAILING the target instead of leading it as common sense would dictate. its definitely no Tribes

from the teammates view clip it looked like she wasn’t using TPP because she jumped out when half of them were facing the direction of the crate. other half was just slow reaction or maybe shock of surprise.

“Die in a fire. Pharah rockets can cross maps for picks.”

is it in the rules? if it is then blizzard should simply make certain heroes unselectable after an optimal combo set is already chosen.

though i don’t think people will continue playing it then.

any One good thing will attracted the masses. the more sought after that good thing is, the more of those people who are attracted to it will be shitty people. holding that appeal against the thing that is sought after is rhetoric that is without any useful point. even child molestors and mass murderes like ice cream…

completely invalid example because choosing a hero you like even if its not a perfect complement is not against the rule. if it was, then overwatch should come up with selectable brackets that only certain combination of players can be selected.

bring back ‘blocking’ players and all of this will cease to be a problem. this is blizzards fault for trying to micromanage something that is too dynamic for them to grasp and understand. they have not provided a single solid argument why the removed blocking, that can be effectively counter argued.

valid points. for me the pace is alright and i even learned a few tricks by watching the pros. what i wish i could do is shut up the announcer. most of it is nonsense filler driver that they seem to try to come up to make themselves sound useful. i don’t want them to be removed completely, but i want it to be possible…

Jane’s F-15 for sure. hyper realistic dog fights and instrument reliance and control that pretty much demands studying real life aviation and flight concepts.

“So paying players can support the habits of cheaters?” no. cheaters supporting the habits of cheaters. they did buy the game. if this is pulled off the right way all cheaters will end up gaming other cheaters (think MLB), and leave normal players alone.

it’s been said several times before, but seeing how writers at Kotaku and some other publications continue to feature Overwatch box when describing how ‘bad’ loot boxes are, it doesn’t appear to seep through.

lets try this again - Overwatch loot system is not only very much a Good Thing aesthetics-wise, but it also…

I think its also plausible that he is what he says he is or maybe with some slight exaggerations but hea simply not interested in sticking out like a sore thumb within the company, or for other implications it would mean for him to be known within the company as the person to took time to respond on behalf of it.

cool concept but it kind of bothers me that front paws don’t look like are strong enough to support the longer torso and extra appendages above. jars from the realm of plausibility. centaurs are drawn in the way that doesn’t give off that perception.

if it’s supposed to be an unlockable achievement after investment of playtime, then how is it different from games before microtransactions came to be? let people earn it by playing the game they enjoy, or if they like cheat by buying it. is the play time required for this too unrealistic due to how bad the game play…

that WiiU gamepad seems to defy usability logic. if the joystick is by the thumb you can control both the joystick with the thumb, And reach the ABXY with the side of your index finger at the same time. instead with WiiU layout you either have to leave the joystick movement to reach the ABXY with the thumb, because…

i’m new to twitching (heh) and had no idea who this was, but thoroughly enjoyed the article and i agree with Trihex’s sentiment. thanks for the writeup!

absolutely agreed. this is one of the few loot box system i am aware of that is actually good/beneficial to all involved. first of all we’re dealing wit things that don’t affect your performance in the game. so its all just trivial cosmetic stuff for funsies. if all of that was always free to use upon release then…

my thinking is that the whole thing should be easily resolvable by allowing people to ‘avoid’ certain players. i saw somewhere claimed that this was in place at one point but undone because people started avoiding players who were merely too good, rather than toxic.

i’m wondering who cares if someone avoids a better…

i’d love to see/read more detail about the settlement and what made these people outside the law and safe from any consequences. would kotaku mind following up?