Don’t whine about “straw men” and “false dilemmas” when you were objecting to “the basic premise.”

“They both have equipment”

Yet he didn’t refer to anything except for the way it looked. Fine. He didn’t like it. So he had to wait. God forbid the ATC do *his* job of directing traffic.

I’m not saying the pilot was…

“the basic premise of some dude sitting in a most likely windowless room, on the ground, looking at a screen with dots and blobs on it.. who then tells the guy who’s actually flying in the weather that he’s wrong and the weather is ligh”

Yeah, monitoring equipment should be entirely discounted in favor of eyeballing it.

Goddammit. You’re right. Here. You get half of the star I gave Foo (of course, Kinja will round it up to a whole one for both of you).

I otherwise agree with you, but no one said anything about banning the show. There is a difference between a boycott and a ban that is enforced by the power of the state.

God forbid they figure out a better solution to the situation than arresting him or personally driving him home.

Let me reiterate:

“these ain’t gay, but they some other level bullshit.”

“31. Be an adult male virgin”

Seriously?

“Vegans Dumbfucks who are vegan are claiming”

“Like making sure this 5-second clip of the Neutral President from Futurama which has had an equal number of likes and dislikes for nearly a decade.”

This is a sentence fragment.

I realize that Disney felt no choice, so I’m not particularly angry at them even though I believe this to be incredibly unfair. But these comments I’m reading are infuriating. Since it’s clear we’re too stupid to discern between jokes that are simply bad attempts at “edgy” or dark humor and ones that reflect a…

“but it is enough of a warning bell to justify Disney separating from themselves from this image.”

No, it’s not. It’s official: we are too fucking stupid to tell the difference between a (bad) joke made to be “edgy” and one that reflects an underlying malice.

I’m over all of this bullshit.

Yes. I read them. It’s “sick”, as a lot of attempts at provocative humor are, but are we really supposed to believe that they reflect anything else?

If the answer is “yes”, then fuck off already. Things have gone too fucking far.

Remember that time everyone drank Butters’ semen thinking it was a sports drink?

But please. Let’s keep pretending we’ve always been absolutely *outraged* by this.

The real joke here is how we’re expected to believe that the tweets reflect anything other than a desire to be provocative.

What fucking nonsense.

Right-leaning Chad just wants tax cuts and regulation cuts. He’s getting them. It’s not like he gives a shit about things like national defense or people other than himself.

Even though in hindsight I sometimes wish Obama had taken an even harder stand against Russia (I scoffed at the time, but Romney had a point; one of few occasions where he has), it’s not as though he was weak by any means. I never doubted he had the best interests of the country at heart and never suspected that he…

You mean that job you voluntarily agreed to perform as an adult and for which you were compensated monetarily, as specified in the contract you willingly signed?

Sure, EXACTLY EQUALLY WRONG.

“but you can’t be certain he’s wrong either.”

Fuck off with that. If he has proof, let him show it. Otherwise, stow the bullshit.

The NRA will surely be helping the man’s family file a lawsuit against the police for violating his Second Amendment rights aaaaaany minute now.

It’s not *that* hard to get: they value cuts to taxes and regulations more than they value people.

My take on Furious is that he probably swallowed a lot of propaganda as a young man, including shit about the war and about his own people. He is as passionate and as perceptive as he is because he knows all the tricks; after all, he once fell for them.