lookieloue1708
LookieLouE1707
lookieloue1708

What? Les Miz was great. I swear, there's no pleasing some people.

You were so offended by people saying mean words about a racist you just couldn’t help but out your own proclivities with a snowflake post. Maybe take your own advice?

No big deal until the next step in the anti-science revolution in which we discover antibiotics are part of the globalist conspiracy just like vaccines, and like them must be rejected.

Eh ... I feel like even steven avery’s wikipedia page does a better job of assessing the case than that article, which is very light on evidence in favor of its anti-pardon position (vague reference to avery’s previous violent and sexual misconduct? Troubling, but not dispositive; perspiration on a hood latch that

I would say the opposite: it demonstrates their total disconnect from reality.

Oh, there’s some entertainment to be had there. Just steal a few pieces from everybody’s puzzles - the pieces with his face on it, etc and imagine their frustration later on.

Instead of wasting their money on vanity campaigns steyer and bloomberg should piss the trumpers off by donating those funds to subsidize abortion services, especially transportation services to enable red-state women to access abortion in blue states.

The current trilogy is the worst trilogy, so that can't be right ...

Bevin is an anti-vaxxer, he’s convinced he knows these cases better than the victims, the people who worked them, including the expert witnesses and the judges and juries in question. He even has a q-anon-lite theory going on where all the prosecutors who are objecting to his pardons are going to be exposed and thrown

... Physical evidence, I presume you mean. There is also the testimony of the victims, but people like bevin don't consider that testimony to be evidence.

Yeah, that’s not right. Especially in the swing states, 2016 was the result of voters going rejecting hillary for third parties, as badombre suggests, not voters going to trump.

This can’t be right. There is debate over whether the pardon limitation only prevents a president from stopping an impeachment proceeding from going forward, or whether it also prevents him from pardoning a criminal offense of which a subject has been convicted by the senate as well as a criminal court, but no court

The opening anecdote makes no sense. If she were such an expert poop timer, why wouldn’t she just retime her bowel movements to fit her class schedule? I’m hoping this is a fake anecdote and not a real personal trauma shared non-consensually and gratuitously on a platform where the real person it happened to might

The owners command nala's life conditions and expropriate the revenue she has produced - sounds like a typical capitalist relationship to me.

Being slut-shamed and repudiated by an authority after being assaulted can be worse than the sexual assault itself, so the targeting choice is not necessarily misplaced. Also, although I doubt the father was thinking this way, intimidating fact-finders is a more efficient means of accomplishing change, because the

This is a wee bit disingenuous. It’s possible to make somebody fall down the stairs by jumping out and startling them, does that mean jumping out and startling them is the equivalent of shoving them down the stairs? You have to include a measure of the likelihood of doing a certain harm when assessing an act, and not

Beforehand get yourself a minor hand injury, get a doctor to put a cast on your hand, and then beat the shit out of the rapist and/or obstructive bureaucrat with the arm that has the cast.

It’s still going to be a false comparison no matter how frequently you insist you’re not wrong (protip: that kind of repetition means you need to move on to some different argument and let what you’ve already posted speak for itself, rather than trying to win the argument via ad nauseum). It’s like if I said “I know

LOL at you pretending to be an usman fan ... You are too cowardly to admit your true agenda, which makes sense. How many people do you think bothered to read your whole screed after the blatant dishonesty at its beginning? Isn't it disappointing, to know how impotent you are?

just as many catholics are “more catholic than the pope” so too cops’ wives tend to be “more cop than the cops”. And demonizing people for associating themselves with the enemy is always helpful. That is how you peel away the enemy’s popular support; it’s the way successful revolutionary movements have always operated.