lookieloue1708
LookieLouE1707
lookieloue1708

Oh, the irony of you posting a nasty, partisan post in which you accuse others of exactly that, while (as noted) claiming that anyone who posts here lacks sense (kamikaze post?). When is the last time you even attempted to make a good-faith contribution to this community? Don’t post to jalopnik again. Try to do

You don’t follow, that’s for sure, and fyi whenever you find yourself saying that in a debate you should be aware you are out over your oars and need to trust your own position less. In this case, stealing a homeless man’s cat means his truck will be impounded, which leaves him with no shelter and no means of feeding

wrong. you do in fact get to just assume that someone who has broken into your home has lethal intent and capacity - the whole point of the castle doctrine is that in your own home you don't have to wait to be attacked. And the fact you suggest honking the horn or turning on the engine demonstrates how little critical

that's special. so you're saying you are someone who had the benefit of extensive use of force training, beyond what is available to ordinary people, and you were invading someone else's turf, which means your self-defense rights were less than someone defending his own turf? so your sops are even relevant to how we

“Under the truck” is more dangerous than most instances of “in the house”. The bad actor can easily shoot you through the floor of the truck - he knows exactly where you are, stuck in the driver’s seat like a sardine - he is within feet of you, and he has more reason to panic and start shooting, because he can’t

more like euthanizing a terminally ill patient.

If he crossed Trump or his eventual successor, that could be a problem, but he won’t. And Democrats don't have the guts to stand up to him. Look at Newsom sucking up to Elon.

First sentence: that's what she said.

Cheaper than an assisted living apartment and much nicer? No way. Not for comparable square footage. Any equivalent comp on a cruise ship would be much more expensive. And that setup is going to substitute for assisted living only for people at the very beginnings of decline. Imagine putting a seriously impaired

autolock shouldn't exist, period. vehicles shouldn't do anything autonomously.

As usual, every accusation from the right is projection. What’s actually indicative of agitprop is the use, by you and the op, of a bogeyman political label that doesn’t remotely fit as a pejorative, ultimately as a means of denigrating people who also are not communist or chinese but are tied to both categories in

it literally is though.

you can't fool me, it's adras-js all the way down.

not necessarily. possibly there were two birds carrying the fish on a line, held under the dorsal guiding feathers.

then the people in the vicinity will be breathing in particles of him, no thanks.

No, the other person is right, and it’s not surprising you can’t acknowledge it. You started your comment with “that’s a you thing”, falsely implying the other poster’s opinion is less representative than yours, and when you got justified pushback for it you dishonestly shifted the goalposts to pretending you merely

You should be banned for this comment. In general, people who threaten to leave a website should have their words taken seriously by having their accounts instabanned, since they either have no reason to retain the use of that account or are lying (which should be reason enough to ban them). The fundamental problem

Sure you are, Dean Browning. You are a liberal and not a lying rightwing hack pretending to be one, which explains your p- no, wait, nobody go look at the hack's post history. Wouldn't want to embarrass it.

* envy, lance. Jealousy is when you resent being robbed of something that legitimately belongs to you, and I don't think you intended to say Bradley deserves your spot.

Interesting strawman, considering it's the antiwokers here who are actually bothered by the post.