lookieloue1708
LookieLouE1707
lookieloue1708

Why not just fo then?

Trump voters vote their tribalism, not their needs, appealing to them is a waste of time, and choosing a candidate based on who "interests" you is hardly any better. Sanders yes, yang yes, warren no is pretty telling/damning.

This is so underrated!

He's being ironical.

you refer it as “Pedd State” (which also suggests you don’t know how to spell pedophile)“

Keep pushing strawman arguments, subhuman, it's an admission you can't defeat the actual arguments put in front of you.

Sorry for failing to decipher your scare quotes, lol, but you are still claiming that there is a specific set of evidence that changed gladwell’s mind, and you are still not identifying what set of evidence that is. That is your burden here.

And when you hear about boys being molested you don’t hear people saying “I have a little brother so this really hits home”.

Damn these modern silicate inorganic nba stars! Somebody has to do something about this.

Well I'm glad it wasn't the same damn horse dying yet again, that would be horrible.

McQueary waited months before going to Paterno (strongly suggesting that he did not see a crime, just something odd).”

While we’re discussing carter let’s not forget he won the governorship of georgia by criticizing his opponent for supporting martin luther king, and by courting the “wallace vote” - while also courting the black vote! He is not what I would call a good person, certainly not a man of principle - that, too, is myth

Yeah, if you are a marxist then there is literally no possibility of bernie being the kind of socialist you are looking for - there’s not an iota of daylight between him and warren as far as that goes, so the distinction you are trying to draw between them is fake news. The only way that disinction makes sense is if

obama won because of his charisma, his image, not his politics. It’s interesting to see people pushing, for purposes of this argument, the idea that obama was some sort of progressive, even though outside this conversation pretty much everyone has accepted obama was just as much centrist trash as the losers biden and

If you’re not willing to lie and engage in hypocrisy to defeat the enemy, you’re not willing to win. That’s why the enemy is winning right now, they are willing to do what it takes. So the question is whether those good governance concerns you are interested in are worth sacrificing the very real material effects of

When was gutter racism ever not a centrist position? The closest I can remember is under obama when the centrist position was "racism doesn't exist because we have a black potus". Before that centrism was bombing muslim countries just in case, and before that centrism was locking up "superpredators".

The crux is not whether how the right will react to any given candidate - they will always be 100% on the offensive. The crux is whether the mainstream media will buy into the attacks carried out by the right, as they did with "her emails". We already have media outlets as far left as slate magazine banging the drum

No. I mean, I understand why that take is popular, but the truth is none of us actually know any of these candidates, and so no candidate is ever judged on their actual qualities - every candidate is judged by public perception of their qualities. The difference between the fate of obama and hillary was that everyone

Just having someone who has “-D” next to his name in the Oval Office is not actually enough anyway.”