I don’t care what color his skin is, I’m making fun of that name. That is a weird fucking name to give your kid.

Seriously. That’s the real story here.

Wait...he had a kid name Autonomy?!? What the fuck?

I’m thinking maybe you’ve had something to do with your 2016 being shitty...

“stand your ground” laws usually are not the problem because they only apply to complete justified self defense cases even in a common law state like Louisiana. All that the stand your ground doctrine refers to is the fact that if you are confronted with force you are not required to try and flee to safety before…

It’s similar to how gawker thinks the hulk tape was okay because hulk was famous. Both miss that there’s fucking TWO people in a sex tape and they need to both consent in order for it to be public.

It’s a tricky subject, the points of view are often incongruous.

Look at this fucking guy.

It should be a forfeit and the Kings awarded the win

Ah shit, I was hoping to see “The Process” drop a load all over Booger Cousins.

What’s wrong with Balthazar? It’s an old name that has stood the test of time. (It was one of the Wise Men who brought gifts to the infant Jesus.) Axel is just a Scandinavian version of another Biblical name. Afton? Well, you got me there..... It’s Swedish. It means “afternoon.” But then calling a girl “Dawn” isn’t…

...the goal was to be bad for multiple years and get a bunch of high draft picks.

...he didn’t brand it as “the process”

because he didn’t suck at his job

I hate the Process and think it’s a bad bet, but I wouldn’t say he sucks at his job. Or, at least, that’s way oversimplifying things. He’s interesting in the same way as Nate Silver or Billy Beane — you can argue either side of their approach, and never be wrong.

Hinkie was “bad” in his first 3 years as GM, just as Ruben Amaro was “good” when he won the division his first 3 years as GM

I think the thing is that you often have to work with people you don’t like. Even people you have nothing but contempt for. Does Romney have ulterior motives in regards to furthering his political career? Could be. But he did stand up to Trump, when many Republicans didn’t, and is a fairly moderate, competent person.…

He’s a sell-out by having dinner with Trump? You have no idea what they talked about. By your logic, there shouldn’t be any rational, competent people in the Trump White House, because those people would find him unfit and therefore obligated to resist him. You’re essentially saying that Trump, Bannon, Giuliani and…

So we’re going to complain when Trump selects dumpsterfires for positions on one hand, but then also point the finger at qualified candidates who actually might work with Trump. The Federal Government is huge. We’re going to need competent people working under Trump to make it through the next four years.

The endgame is to make people say, “Mitt is trying to do public service by going to work for someone he hates because there has to be at least one semi-reasonable person in the whole of the cabinet.” Assuming he’s working for something other than his own enrichment is always a bad bet.