Good point. I guess I was holding out hope for something more like this.

He was the bomb in Phantoms, yo!

I think someone stayed up very late, drank a few too many cups of coffee, and then had the type of brilliant thought process known to people who pull all nighters and said,” I KNOW! I’LL WRITE LIKE I’M BACK IN A CREATIVE WRITING WORKSHOP WITH THAT HOT TEACHER WHO HAD A VANITY NOVEL PUBLISHED THAT ONE TIME!”

A strong argument for the people who believe that white people shouldn’t say “woke”?

Did Spaeth honestly think that the station would just ignore the first two answers and go with the third answer? Didn’t either of them see the red light on the camera through all this and realize, “Oh crap, we’re so screwed?”

You say it like Hillary didn’t break her agreement to debate Bernie again before California.

so because she refused a debate, the mean ol mens shouldn’t have one? lol, the old lady had her a chance and she took her ball and went home, so fuck her.

No. Racial inquality and economic inequality may overlap in many rays, but they are inherently different. To treat one as the “core” over the other is myopic.

Come on Evan! How is PegLegBoy supposed to continue to ignore race if you’re throwing it in is god damned face all the time!?! This is Gizmodo!! Computers don’t see race!

I thought it was fucked up when she crammed him in the washer. I was not prepared for how much worse it would get.

Just go to the next post.

No, zero rating is all bad. Why? It will lead to more monopolies. How you ask? Like so: Company A is huge and established. Company A pays T-mobile to exempt it’s service from their customers data plans. Company B is small and a start up. Company B can’t afford to pay T-mobile to exempt it’s data from customers bills.…

Just speaking from my own experience, mentioning anything about her record is followed quickly with the attempted shut down: “you’re just saying that because she’s a woman.” Snake eating its own tail

Yet you mentioned his avoidance of her record only once and in passing at that.

He brings that up to point out that people can’t relate to her. She doesn’t seem like a regular everyday person to some people. I know that’s a fucking stupid thing to consider when electing a leader, but it makes people feel better.

If that were actually the case, you’d be writing about her record not her gender.

But, again, male politicians have made what you are calling “hobbies” central parts of their signaling for several election cycles. George W Bush would “have a beer” with you, Reagan was your granddad, Bill Clinton the Charming Southern Boy, Barack Obama played basketball and had the hardest time quitting smoking.

I take the point that gender is a factor in her unpopularity and it’s preposterous Brooks doesn’t mention this. But I think you’re straw-manning Brooks’s point about hobbies a little. He mentions lack of hobbies as a symptom of a broader likeability issue: “Clinton’s unpopularity is akin to the unpopularity of a…

Perhaps it’s because America doesn’t give a shit that she’s a woman? There’s that possibility.

Bill's hobby, strange pussy, didn't earn him any points.