They were talking about Japan not Europe.

exactly. Harris was doing a job with the tools he had, not advancing across europe gassing people or locking them up

I agree with WarnerToddHuston, this is BS - a misguided attempt to have a "balanced" view. General Harris' "moral bombing" approach failed, but he didn't commit war crimes in Germany. The allies bombed German cities because it was rational, from their military point of view and given the means they had available to…

They just made sure that the Germans and Japanese who sown the wind harvested the bomb laden whirlwind.

Kind of ridiculous to add Curtis LeMay and Gen Harris in there, really. PC nonsense, that.

You are exactly right. The idea that government regulation of the Internet is going to make it better is a serious ROTFLMAO moment.

The un-regulated non-neutral net has so far very well responded to my needs.

Sometimes Twitter IS perfection.

She claims that he choked and hit her and forcibly raped her anally. These are all facts she alleges.

How dare you question the obvious contradictions in Emma's narrative! Heresy! Rape apologist! Patriarchy!

"almost assaulted" aka the guy who "did nothing to you."

Or you know...she is making the entire rape up. Even the kangaroo court at Columbia which is set up to give the accused basically zero chance of being acquitted found this guy innocent. There's no truth to her claims. LOL at you people refusing to even consider the possibility that this is BS

Yeah probably. "I love you. Also I want to talk about when you raped me, k?"

No truer words. No truer words.

You should just ignore Fresh Beets. He's a Gawker Approved Troll. He is more racist than any other commenter on this site, and adds nothing to any conversation other than hate speak. I am saddened to see you prove that two of your children passed away by showing pictures. I can't even imagine. In other news, I…

I have two, and have had two others die shortly after death... that would probably be considered tragic, I guess, due to a surgeon malpractice. Thanks for joining the conversation though.

They're not mutually exclusive. The correct reaction would have been to demand the gun to be put down, or give some sort of warning. They didn't do that, and thus they reacted in the wrong way to someone have a real weapon.

Or you know.. Don't break the law. If you didn't break the law, just follow the officer's instructions anyway. That's why there's attorneys.