lolliPOPS
lolliPOPS
lolliPOPS

OMG, I’m so glad this wasn’t about your parents buying a house someone was murdered in hence the affordable cost, etc., and it ended up being haunted.  Much better this way, and sweet.

I’d think it was someone trying to scam me out of thousands of dollars by “selling” me a house they didn’t own.

Plot twist: guy trying to break into your house is a demon hunter

I never post so I don’t know if anyone will see this but, a few weeks ago, I came home to this. That is not my hand.

How does one go from “Bush doesn’t care about black people” to supporting the most overtly racist president in US history?

I *hate* when photos are taken in a style that makes people think that they were never shopped. Like their entire public persona is as altered and airbrushed as humanly medically possible. Not that anyone is saying any different, but the very idea that people could think that that’s an intimate photo of her (real,

I had the same issue - the many errors made it hard to keep reading.

Diana, I’m not trying to be rude, but you really need to brush up on your proofreading skills.

These people do have a right to speech. It is just that platforms also have a right to determine what content they want and don’t want to host. YouTube has been messing with some of my favorite creators by demonetizing the videos because of language and content. I don’t like it but it is their right. That is why I

I think these rednecks are confused.

Actually I took that to mean that no one has spoken to him about it or gotten his side of the story at all. Which does seem like something that that should happen in a proper investigation.

Without making comment on anything else in your post: no, Tambor is not saying that the victims need to speak directly to him about their grievances. He’s claiming that neither he, nor Amazon, have been told what specific action(s) caused these claims. That’s quite distinct from claiming he wants the victims to talk

Women and gender-fluid people run the show, and are his bosses, and are powerful in the context of this show. Why are they not responsible for the environment in which victims could complain, as much as Jeffrey Tambor is?

“You can have versions of feminism that don’t incorporate thinking about the ways in which people experience multiple forms of oppression. Is it as effective? No.”

So exactly what I said... cool? I think we are in passionate agreement here. Maybe I just know exceptionally shitty men but I don’t think I know a single guy who hasn’t done something at least problematic in their intimate relationships (not specifically with me, in general). If I got rid of all guys in my life that

Uh, I didn’t say that the victim needed to accept it. I actually am 100% of the idea that no victim has any responsibility to forgive or have contact with the perpetrator. Same as with other person-to-person crimes.

that’s not what demonstrably said, and that’s not what aziz is, and you know it. was it rape? no. was it sexual assault? yeah. (some would argue no but they’re not the victim in this scenario.)

I think if we are going to cut off every guy who has ever done something borderline amiss we are going to be incredibly lonely people. I don’t think the answer is ostracism. There needs to be dialogue. Guys feel cornered and will act defensively when confronted. That, for some reason, is almost the universal human

One cannot have it both ways. I don’t like hypocrisy on either side. If this was an Israeli model with anti-Palestinian tweets, this site would be calling for her head. This is a problematic and complicated issue, and both Palestinian and Israeli children have died in this conflict.

It is. A person in custody cannot consent to a sexual act.