So does Michael back track on this ridiculously biased narrative now that the cops are coming out with a bogus story that she “slapped” the police car? I’ll wait.

Today’s episode of “Stupid or Liar” focuses on the death of Justine Ruszczyk (Her name was not Damond. It was going to be Damond after she was married. If America adhered to that as the journalistic standard, my high school yearbook would have referred to me as “Sir Michael Harriot, husband of Janet Jackson”).

This is hilarious.

The way this site is reacting to this situation is fucking disgraceful. I’m pretty fucking sure you’re happy she’s dead.

Wow, this place really is the black Breitbart, isn’t it?

(Her name was not Damond. It was going to be Damond after she was married. If America adhered to that as the journalistic standard, my high school yearbook would have referred to me as “Sir Michael Harriot, husband of Janet Jackson”).

No.

If she had a clean criminal record, they’d at least put out the most menacing, villainous photo of her, the way they did Trayvon Martin. They’d go back as far as her high school teachers or her neighbors to find a personality defect that would adequately describe why the valiant hero cop feared for his life.

Given that Root readers in the main claim they don’t give a crap about Justine, you sure do spend a lot of time writing about her.And why can’t you at least respect the murdered woman by calling her by the name she chose to be called by? You’d do it for any victim of the police whom you do care about..

I was thinking the same exact thing... He is mad at the lawyer for trying to make his victim look as much of a victim as he possibly can? That’s his job... You may need to retract your last statement in this article... 😂😂😂

I promise they will not like what comes in due time.

Most of The Root readers are half or more white anyway. Yall not even pure black so you qualify as “white allies”. Yall not even real niggas

He probably still refers to Caitlyn Jenner as Bruce.

It may or may not but that’s for the reader to decide. You can’t leave that out.

I think it definitely matters and I also think the author has valid points. To leave that fact out though is a big writing no-no. That’s my issue.

Sure it is. The Castile case is over. Do you not know any lawyers? Also that doesn’t make the author’s omission look any better (which is my issue.)

“(Her name was not Damond. It was going to be Damond after she was married. If America adhered to that as the journalistic standard, my high school yearbook would have referred to me as “Sir Michael Harriot, husband of Janet Jackson”).”

 Does Michael Harriot write this passionately about black on black violence - a much bigger and more pervasive issue.

During my wait, an attorney called Ruszczyk the “most innocent” police shooting victim he’s ever seen. Robert Bennett—the lawyer who made these comments—is either blatantly lying or he is the stupidest white man in the long, storied history of stupid white men.

“During my wait, an attorney called Ruszczyk the “most innocent” police shooting victim he’s ever seen. Robert Bennett—the lawyer who made these comments—is either blatantly lying or he is the stupidest white man in the long, storied history of stupid white men.”