The victim’s daughter “claimed” he was reading a book, but I’m sure you believed that.

You say you’ll wait for the facts to emerge, yet you are one of the first people to comment with an opinion.

Tina Turner has been on the cover multiple times.

Come on, now, you can’t just disavow the protesters who get violent if the majority of the protesters allow it to continue and don’t shut it down. Or are you trying to claim that the emptying trucks and burning shit on the highway was a random act completely unrelated to the protests going on?

Bob Dole. Jesse Jackson. Limbaugh. Hell, Tiger Woods.

Just read that and came here to see if the story had been updated.

The Enquirer has actually legitimately broken quite a number major political scandals, e.g. John Edwards.

Open carry is not the same as brandishing. Open carry allows you to holster a weapon on your hip or chest straps. It’s still illegal to pull the gun out and brandish it when you’re approached by a COP.

Ha! Because abolition is ssooooooo realistic. Everything or nothing! We will rebuild something we could fix with independent review boards!

The NY Times is now reporting that no book has been found and that a gun has been recovered from the scene.

Yes. I imagine you dispense your own form of vigilante justice when people wrong you. You deal with break ins yourself. You get yourself to safety when in danger. When you see shootings taking place, you run toward the shots yourself. Right? No. You don’t know what any of those things are like and it’s because they…

First of all, apparently this guy got out of his car with a loaded weapon, so it seems as if the police might be justified in killing him.

No, I don’t. I think some of them are on power trips and might enjoy cracking heads and writing parking tickets. However, if the “vast majority” relished killing black and brown people there would be a lot more dead black and brown people.

Looks true enough at least about looting vehicles stranded on I85.

Keep your sane and logical reflection on the information out of here please. We are only accepting comments that fit within the established BLM narrative.

Expressing anger can be done without violence. Violence, and looting too, distract from the real issues. It gets people to pay attention to the wrong things.

Sure, he was within his rights to have a gun. However, when his brother and sister say he was unarmed that would discredit them as reliable witnesses.

Ugh. Thinking that way is part of the problem and contributes to the toxic environment we find ourselves in.

There’s been a whole slew of articles recently in defense of looting and rioting by the usual outlets who would write such things, even right here. It’s speech, and don’t silence their expression of pain or some such nonsense. Don’t worry that’s what insurance is for, they say as if it magically makes everything…

It’s not entirely clear that he was unarmed: