ljn9yqqdbepfi
lJN9yQQDBepFi
ljn9yqqdbepfi

Nonsense. James Holmes passed several movie theaters in favor of one that was “gun free”. The San Bernadino mass murderer made similar decisions in finding easily murdered victims.

As I’ve always wanted to visit NZ, how about if we continue our discussions there.?

The great news is that I don’t have to try to shame people or threaten them with arrest so I can get the government (or closely aligned company) to fund my career.

Yet, I think we can agree that it was a commonly held belief (that it now discarded by today’s philosophies).

If you’d invested as much effort in learning about this topic as I have (everyone needs a hobby), you’d know that nearly every public mass shooting has happened in “Gun Free” (aka Murderer/Terrorist Protection) Zones.

NASA and NOAA have had to change their data to fit the politically-driven theories.

Nope. You are wrong.

For abortions initiated out of pure selfishness and convenience, how far does someone need to drive to stop being promiscuous and irresponsible?

Furthermore, the study doesn’t address your implied assertion that drunk, emotional people with (the fabricated) “easy access to firearms” increases gun crime.

I’ve yet to see any anti-gun group that didn’t spin the data (aka flat out LIE).

The point is that climate zealots claim absolutely ANY event (or non-event) proves man-made global warming.

Some sources say they are actually up by 27%!

Hmm. How about the New York Times?.

First of all, you site is a distinctly anti-gun site. It has a lack of objectivity that doesn’t make it worth even slicing the data.

Frankly, you are wrong.

Nope. I didn’t see justification for your claim about the drunken emotional people with “easy access to firearms” causing more problems.

No, this attack says something about you.

Umm, repeated failed “scientific” claims are a start.

The objective “science” media political correctness explains why an outlier needs to do that.

Sure. Let’s look back.