They must be safer since the polar bears were all killed off.

Hmm. As an “expert” in palaeoclimaology, perhaps you can explain the peer reviewed scientific consensus of events that would disprove the Global Warming theories.

Hmm. Some people might call it a naturally occurring cycle.

It was a commonly held belief. The primary difference now with the Global Warming/Climate Change crowd is the enforced political correctness by the Zealots who punishes and threatens “non-believers” if they fail to fall in line. All this is despite the repeatedly failed Global Warming predictions.

Do you mean like this actual scientist who founded The Weather Channel and debunks the bogus claims of the Global Cooling/Global Warming/Climate Change/Next Flawed Theory Zealots.

Here is more information you can ignore. Because SCIENCE.

Paid troll?

Uh huh.

I guess hyperlinks on a webpage are confusing to you then.

Glad you agree.

Huh. A natural cycle that wasn’t aided by heavily taxed SUVs.

Hmm. Given your silly claims, I suppose you can back that up with data?

I figure since Barry Obama is buying a seaside house, it is safe for everyone else to do it too.

What are you even talking about?

So, as you can’t dismiss the data, you go for the personal attack.

The earth hasn’t warmed for ~20 years. This more than covers the time frame of catastrophic events predicted by Albert Gore and “experts”.

Those are some wildly imaginative scenarios you have going on there.

Sure. I looked.

Sure. When the earth actually warms that’s a start. Aside from the falsified (and now debunked) data from NASA and the NOAA, it hasn’t happened.

In the 1970’s, warm weather was considered mild, and cold weather was considered harsh. Climatologists blamed all bad weather on global cooling,