livingstone-returns
Dr Livingstone
livingstone-returns

There were greco-roman mummies. They've got pretty cool naturalistic portraits, too. Though a lot of the ones were also cut-rate jobs and they were stuffed with random scrap paper. There are a number of ancient texts we only have (though sometimes only in fragments) because someone went with a cheap mortuary and the

The problem is that satirizing the very movie you're actually making is always going to be tricky.

And at least spider-man 3 was an interesting kind of bad. And it was distinctive. I can still recall scenes with perfect clarity, and it definitely excited a lot of strong opinions. So it was a level of engaging, even if it failed overall. I barely remember anything about the first Andrew Garfield movie. It's like

the only thing that gives me pause is the divorce storyline (based on basically: the teaser for it last season, and the mention of it here). I kind of had the same problem with the trial back in season 1. The show has established that Kimmy was kidnapped, raped, and abused. Even as a send up as rape culture, there's

"Slight" might also mean "empty". You can have 2.5 hours of spectacle that somehow also seems rather thin.

They did the thing too many shows do: they made him way too evil to walk back from, which makes their attempts to do so at best weak and at worst really disturbing. I mean, holy hell, the whole plot with the preying on vulnerable teenagers and murdering them in order to sell their brains to rich people. (And also the

I think I'd probably argue that RTD is the construction, and Moffat is the deconstruction, but just for the reasons you describe. Because the RTD stories were mostly from a point of view removed from the Doctor himself (whether that was his companions or someone else) they didn't linger on the damage except when it

There's always a chance with the whole "Watergate with a Russian twist" thing could take him down, too.

I get annoyed at people who actually managed to get off their asses and get to the polls, and then held up their hands and said, "oh no, I couldn't possibly sully myself by making a choice between Trump and Clinton."

Aha, okay, I can see that.

Yeah, I had that thought too. But if so, I don't think it was in a petty way, as much as it struck me as riffing on earlier elements and playing around with them, or just diving deeper into unexplored areas. Actually, a lot of stuff in Moffat's run strikes me that way - like he'd kind of had a notebook of things that

I suspect the GOP would show amazing unity and work to get some truly horrific things passed in November 2018 - January 2019 were the Democrats to crush them in the midterms.

I'd say the long term griping is about the Poles, but that always struck me as being more along the lines of resentment (they're taking our jobs, but also our unemployment benefits!), rather than the "brown foreigners INFILTRATING us to take us DOWN from WITHIN (and also they're taking our jobs and also our

Was it meant to be a game changing revelation?

About Rory and Amy, I don't think they get stuck in New York until after that episode is set. It's supposed to be like five years in their future, right? But don't they have their 10th anniversary party in one of their episodes?

I love that everyone's reactions were exactly the same.

Danny would like a word.

Yes. I feel most sorry for London.

Well, they'll just keep putting off the women-lead films until everyone's sick to death of the MCU, and then when they tank, they'll blame them for killing the franchise.

I'm not sure I'd actually argue about him being primary, ever. He gets close enough that I hesitate to call him secondary exactly, but he's never front and center, beyond his importance to Amy. But he SHOULD have been, because he was great, clearly.